Sorry for the late reply.
Steve: I am not bored but glad to discuss with a knowledgeable apex like you .Most I come across aren't your league hence that rant, my good luck that you aren't the same. Kindly notice I had also quoted the following you did not reply to
I like all breeds and I have to foster more of the foreign breeds because their owners face issues . We are trying to help a friend find the best way around. So why would I suggest him to go for a breed which has some inherent issue like the dog foul or temperature resistance ( resulting into drool or skin problems) which majority of the foreign breeds in here suffer? Especially when we have vast options and almost all of them will thrive in all parts of the country.
Adding up I like all breeds thoroughly. Once I get a dog its breed or physical standardized specification hardly matters .Some dogs have exceptional abilities and some issues accompanied. Hip dysplasia for example is accompanied with big breeds like Boxers,German shepherds, Rottweilers, retrievers, Great Danes , St. Bernards,etc . All this in spite of dedicated research and all possible ways to avoid it by the breeders abroad. The story here is different .If Fluffy and Fang are good working dogs the owners will breed them . Done without a single medical test or examination yet there aren't any serious hereditary issues with the big indigenous breeds comparing to the above mentioned breeds and many others as well. This again to contradict myself I state that these problems are not scientifically checked if they might exist but assessed on the working ability of the dog and HOPED they might not exist an a good working specimen. There are breeds non indigenous with such qualities as well , I wont deny . But shouldnt we say the homies are really strong?
Some indigenous breeds are now extinct and rest on the verge. All indigenous are engineered as working dogs and not so appealing to an random eye and people here fancy all the foreign stuff hence these populations are diminishing. The hunting pack has lost its job, so the need to keep them is lost as well .I try to make a difference by introducing their qualities / abilities to convince someone home an indigenous breed specimen. How would one would deny their qualities like less maintenance , good immunity, adaptable to climate and dwelling comfort changes, predictable guarding instinct, no feeding tantrums, least coat issues,less drool and more aren't helpful keeping a dog ?
Hvj1: the biased liking towards some breed exists with me as well. I have foster failed and permanently homed 4 foreign breeds.
Kanwar: All will agree that it is never a bad animal but an inexperienced owner. Though Bully kuttas are sweet I wont suggest to keep them in a flat . Their aggression isnt painful but their weight is .Especially when they actually BULLY and step on the foot. But you can consider one of the hound class : Pashmi,Caravan or the Mudhol. Well behaved with kids, good guards plus all the qualities stated above. To add up, they will be glad to play the GAME you wish. I don't intend to impose anything and the decision is totally yours but just trying to promote the homies . You can always adopt a Lab ret. and you will be helping that abandoned soul.The quality labs come up for adoption too. Search YODA {youth organisation in defense of animals} ALL THE VERY BEST!!
Essdee : no offence taken as had I been of that attitude, I wouldn't be cleaning maggots and ticks for foster dogs often. Was trying help to prenotify the issues of a Flat Dog.
seenay mein hain chingariyaan , thodasa barood bhartey hain......
Girte hain Shahi sawar maidaan-e-jung mein, woh kya girenge jo ghutno pe chala kartey hain