IOF .22 ammo is not so poor after all?
- BowMan
- One of Us (Nirvana)
- Posts: 446
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 7:09 pm
IOF .22 ammo is not so poor after all?
My dad seems to think so and I seem to agree. I have heard some unconfirmed reports of IOF importing a complete plant from Eley...?
The first group is from RWS .22 target ammo and the second is using IOF Kanpur .22 ball ammunition. Both are 15 shots each done today by dad shooting prone using a 50 year old Anschütz Match Model 54 club rifle. Conditions are humid with little or no wind.
What do you think?
The first group is from RWS .22 target ammo and the second is using IOF Kanpur .22 ball ammunition. Both are 15 shots each done today by dad shooting prone using a 50 year old Anschütz Match Model 54 club rifle. Conditions are humid with little or no wind.
What do you think?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- dev
- Old Timer
- Posts: 2614
- Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:16 pm
- Location: New Delhi
Re: IOF .22 ammo is not so poor after all?
I had heard about the collaboration with Eley...the plant and all. One friend was shooting the new ammo and had a louder pop to it. I haven't shot any at the range.
But it is possible that change has finally come.
BY the way your father is quite a shot though, if those are fifty meter groups.
But it is possible that change has finally come.
BY the way your father is quite a shot though, if those are fifty meter groups.
To ride, to speak up, to shoot straight.
- BowMan
- One of Us (Nirvana)
- Posts: 446
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 7:09 pm
Re: IOF .22 ammo is not so poor after all?
These are 50 meters groups...
-
- On the way to nirvana
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 12:03 pm
- Location: mumbai
Re: IOF .22 ammo is not so poor after all?
its difficult to comment.
why not set up the gun in a vice and fire equal number of rounds of both brands , that would be definitive.
doctor
why not set up the gun in a vice and fire equal number of rounds of both brands , that would be definitive.
doctor
- BowMan
- One of Us (Nirvana)
- Posts: 446
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 7:09 pm
Re: IOF .22 ammo is not so poor after all?
Yup that would be definitive and I am also thinking of adding some chronograph tests. But I think there is definitely some improvement on part of IOF.
Another thing to consider is that rim-fire rifles can be very picky about which ammo they like.
Another thing to consider is that rim-fire rifles can be very picky about which ammo they like.
- dev
- Old Timer
- Posts: 2614
- Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:16 pm
- Location: New Delhi
Re: IOF .22 ammo is not so poor after all?
Bowman,
You have a very tough act to follow . You father is a pretty good shot. Must be shooting 90 % or thereabouts.
You have a very tough act to follow . You father is a pretty good shot. Must be shooting 90 % or thereabouts.
To ride, to speak up, to shoot straight.
- BowMan
- One of Us (Nirvana)
- Posts: 446
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 7:09 pm
Re: IOF .22 ammo is not so poor after all?
I guess that's why I stay happy with my Bow
But yes for someone who is 60 and has diabetes he does good shooting.
But yes for someone who is 60 and has diabetes he does good shooting.
Re: IOF .22 ammo is not so poor after all?
Hi bowman very nice groups at 50 mts , give my regards and respect to the gentlemen and for iof ammo its definitely a welcome change....
regards
Lever Action
regards
Lever Action
- BowMan
- One of Us (Nirvana)
- Posts: 446
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 7:09 pm
Re: IOF .22 ammo is not so poor after all?
Thanks Lever Action...
- TC
- Veteran
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 11:50 am
- Location: Kolkata
Re: IOF .22 ammo is not so poor after all?
Bowman, I saw both the groups.... They speak a lot about a 60 year old young man with eyes like an eagle. Forget the ammo man ! He will shoot the same group with whatever you give him. Take my word for it.
My regards to your Dad
TC
My regards to your Dad
TC
- BowMan
- One of Us (Nirvana)
- Posts: 446
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 7:09 pm
Re: IOF .22 ammo is not so poor after all?
Thanks for that TC