Who took this shot ?

Post all jokes/ quizzes/ teasers/ 'identify this' type of posts here
Post Reply
User avatar
eternalme
One of Us (Nirvana)
One of Us (Nirvana)
Posts: 336
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:51 pm
Location: Gurgaon
Contact:

Who took this shot ?

Post by eternalme » Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:28 am

6 inch dia target, 100yds away, the target was moving at 16 feet per second and rifle used .22LR.

There were no practice shots,First shot missed by 8 inch 5 o'clock, Almost Bulls eye second shot 2 o'clock.
ll====lll lll====ll
lll Subs lll

For Advertising mail webmaster
User avatar
eternalme
One of Us (Nirvana)
One of Us (Nirvana)
Posts: 336
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:51 pm
Location: Gurgaon
Contact:

Re: Who took this shot ?

Post by eternalme » Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:39 am

No one has any guess I suppose,

It was infamous JFK assassination shot, I don't think Ostwalt had any training in that kind of shot placement.

So the question remains who took that shot?
ll====lll lll====ll
lll Subs lll

penpusher

Re: Who took this shot ?

Post by penpusher » Tue Feb 24, 2009 1:35 am

JFK was shot with a 6.5 Mannlicher-Carcano

User avatar
eternalme
One of Us (Nirvana)
One of Us (Nirvana)
Posts: 336
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:51 pm
Location: Gurgaon
Contact:

Re: Who took this shot ?

Post by eternalme » Tue Feb 24, 2009 2:03 am

I read it was .22LR , that is another thing that the rifle ostwalt was supposed to have was 6.5 Mannlicher-Carcano, and a full jacketed bullet was found on the stretcher as well.

How did the bullet decide to come out and land on the stretcher is anyones guess. :-)
ll====lll lll====ll
lll Subs lll

shadowphaxone
Almost at nirvana
Almost at nirvana
Posts: 114
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 5:58 am
Location: Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala

Re: Who took this shot ?

Post by shadowphaxone » Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:19 am

There is a Hollywood movie FULL METAL JACKET(1988) in which it is mentioned that the JFK killer was a marine
There are no limits to a man's curious intelligence if he is determined to succeed...

User avatar
raj
Almost at nirvana
Almost at nirvana
Posts: 179
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 7:15 am
Location: india

Re: Who took this shot ?

Post by raj » Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:02 pm

Found a video about it.It is a bit disturbing depicting the final head shot in close up & slow motion.
I dont think its good to post its link here.If any member still want to see it,i will PM its link.
Was a .22lr used??Because the video shows a very ugly gunshot wound which i doubt that a .22 can make.

Regards
Raj
---I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be the one controlling it.

---"Slow is Smooth,Smooth is Fast"

BJL
Almost at nirvana
Almost at nirvana
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 9:52 pm
Location: NYC

Re: Who took this shot ?

Post by BJL » Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:59 pm

The officially accepted version is that the weapon used was a 6.5 mm Carcano.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Ke ... tion_rifle
“To be both a speaker of words and a doer of deeds”- The Iliad.

User avatar
hamiclar01
Shooting true
Shooting true
Posts: 964
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 4:46 am
Location: delhi
Contact:

Re: Who took this shot ?

Post by hamiclar01 » Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:52 pm

shadowphaxone wrote:There is a Hollywood movie FULL METAL JACKET(1988) in which it is mentioned that the JFK killer was a marine
Nicholas Cage in THE ROCK was actually about to tell us who the killers were, when the end credits start rolling in. Damn! :wink:
"Stan, don't you know the first law of physics? Anything that's fun costs at least eight dollars."

BJL
Almost at nirvana
Almost at nirvana
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 9:52 pm
Location: NYC

Re: Who took this shot ?

Post by BJL » Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:55 pm

LOL. Yes. You got rid of 'ol Hamilcar's image eh?
“To be both a speaker of words and a doer of deeds”- The Iliad.

User avatar
hamiclar01
Shooting true
Shooting true
Posts: 964
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 4:46 am
Location: delhi
Contact:

Re: Who took this shot ?

Post by hamiclar01 » Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:57 pm

eternalme wrote:6 inch dia target, 100yds away, the target was moving at 16 feet per second and rifle used .22LR.

There were no practice shots,First shot missed by 8 inch 5 o'clock, Almost Bulls eye second shot 2 o'clock.
..... if you hadn't mentioned .22LR I would have pressed the buzzer for Prithviraj Chauhan in the Raaso

remember the mat chookey chauhan line :wink:

-- Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:28 pm --
BJL wrote:LOL. Yes. You got rid of 'ol Hamilcar's image eh?
yup. it was a pain to dust at weekends, and perpetual frown was frightening the birds
"Stan, don't you know the first law of physics? Anything that's fun costs at least eight dollars."

MoA
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1644
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 8:08 pm

Re: Who took this shot ?

Post by MoA » Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:26 am

If you had 11 dots to the right of the cross hair.. it could be done.
With the carnaco... forget it.. :deadhorse:

User avatar
dev
Old Timer
Old Timer
Posts: 2614
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:16 pm
Location: New Delhi

Re: Who took this shot ?

Post by dev » Tue Apr 21, 2009 7:48 pm

eternalme wrote:6 inch dia target, 100yds away, the target was moving at 16 feet per second and rifle used .22LR.

There were no practice shots,First shot missed by 8 inch 5 o'clock, Almost Bulls eye second shot 2 o'clock.
Wasn't me on a bad day :lol: .

Dev
To ride, to speak up, to shoot straight.

penpusher

Re: Who took this shot ?

Post by penpusher » Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:44 pm

Contemporary sources paint a different picture about Prithvi Raj Chauhan after his defeat at the hands of Mohammed Ghori.Off course we would like to believe Chand Bardai's Prithviraj Rasso as it exists today.It is more romantic.A lot similar to gap between facts and what people like to believe about the Kennedy assassination.

User avatar
hamiclar01
Shooting true
Shooting true
Posts: 964
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 4:46 am
Location: delhi
Contact:

Re: Who took this shot ?

Post by hamiclar01 » Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:00 pm

penpusher wrote:Contemporary sources paint a different picture about Prithvi Raj Chauhan after his defeat at the hands of Mohammed Ghori.Off course we would like to believe Chand Bardai's Prithviraj Rasso as it exists today.It is more romantic.A lot similar to gap between facts and what people like to believe about the Kennedy assassination.
true, hence I limited the quip to
hamiclar01 wrote: Prithviraj Chauhan in the Raaso
remember the mat chookey chauhan line :wink:
not the Chauhan of history.

I am neither a sensationalist, nor a romantic. However, others disregard his actual end and chose to believe a fantasy, fine by me. As long as that does not involve smashing libraries, stopping trains, or setting fires to property (among other things) in the name of miffed sensitivity.
"Stan, don't you know the first law of physics? Anything that's fun costs at least eight dollars."

Post Reply