Unlike a "renowned shot" there is no clear definition of who qualifies as a "reputed"
. The logic used by some bureaucrats would be, "since a license is a privilege it should be discretionary".
While I want to say that any movement in the direction of a more liberal issuing of licensing is a move in the right direction, this discretionary/arbitrary issuing is wrong and creates more inequality than there is already.
Perhaps they fear a situation of a civil war or over throw of the government, or perhaps a situation as it exists in Pakistan/Afghanistan. I know this was one of the reasons for the promulgation of restrictive firearms law in UK right after World War II.
Considering there are so many illegals in India,perhaps they are taking the easy way out.... disarm all civilians and make them totally dependant on the Government, but what they fail to see is that the illegals will find illegal weapons no matter what the licensing requirements are for us poor fools. An objective analysis of statistics of crime rates where the use of a licensed firearm as against police/armed forces firearms must also be done to change this mindset. But...
Regards,
Anand