This thread is for discussing aspects we need to look at, for filing a PIL against Gun import restrictions in EXIM policy.
Members who want to contribute towards this topic please re-post their comments in this thread,From here on the action body might select major points and work a draft for the same.
Regards
-- Sun Mar 01, 2009 18:04 --
Below is a previous post by goodboy_mentor, quoted here as reference.
This is exactly I am thinking. IFG/GFI has to take the lead.
Data available till date with Crime Records Bureau under Home Ministry can be collected using RTI, as to what percentage of violent crimes(including terrorism) have been committed by "licensed" firearms AND what percentage of violent crimes(including terrorism) have been committed using "unlicensed" firearms/arms not required "licensing".
On basis of above data PIL can be filed to remove import restrictions/easing licensing norms.
The legal procedures to lift the Np arms from the Negative list of Exim Policy, I can think of, is to file a PIL for below mentioned 4 reasons:
1)Arms License holders as consumers are not getting option to purchase weapon of their own choice.
2)IOF has no competition leading to poor quality weapons & exorbitant prices for consumers.
3)Government loosing revenue which could be earned by way of custom duty.
4)Import restriction serves no purpose as majority of violent crimes are committed by "illegal" firearms and not by legally owned firearms. (This has to be substantiated from data available till date, obtained from Crime Records Bureau under Home Ministry using RTI, as to what percentage of violent crimes(including terrorism) have been committed by "licensed" firearms AND what percentage of violent crimes(including terrorism) have been committed using "unlicensed" firearms/arms not required "licensing".)
I am willing to join others in the forum interested in filling PIL against this "license" raj & import restrictions.