

regards

OUP
Yep... thats what I said too...Mo";p="55556 wrote: ...Most of the computers in the market are at par when it comes to performance...
But the motherboard itself has a maximum BUS speed to support, right?Mo";p="55556 wrote: ...Buy the fastest processor you can afford. Almost every other component can be upgraded easily later...
Since Mack The Knife will mostly be using the laptop in lieu of his desktop, I suppose he will be using it at home, most of the time plugged onMo";p="55556 wrote: I would definitely not hold anything against Vista.
First of all, its new. And for something thats new, it works a lot better than XP did, when it was first launched.
Vista's much more secure for the average user than XP. The Defender that comes as default on Vista can actually protect your computer without any other active anti-virus (This has been proven) as long as you dont go looking for an infection.
Most of the computers in the market are at par when it comes to performance. The difference is in the service. As long as you get good service, buy any computer.
HP has service centres spewn across the city. So if you have an issue, there's always a service centre close by. The same is true for Acer and IBM. Though I wouldnt put my money on Acer, as they seem to be mysteriously dipping in quality. IBM is legendary for its quality at the cost of bland looking systems. Dell does not have any service centres. Its always a site visit by a tech.
Macs are great machines for all the applications you mentioned, but would never come within the budget you mentioned. HP and Dell would be your best bets. A lot of variety, cost effective, great service.
If choosing Dell, steer clear of the new studio line. Look for the Inspiron or Vostro. Both the series have systems within your budget and suiting the work.
If choosing HP, dont listen to the sales executive. All the systems have reviews online - you know what to do.
Here's a quick guide on what to look for:
Buy the fastest processor you can afford. Almost every other component can be upgraded easily later. Go for Core 2 Duo (not Dual Core or Core Duo) with Centrino Badging. These consume less power = more battery backup. Also, AutoCad requires more processing power than memory.
1 GB of memory should be sufficient unless you intend to do heavy imaging/editing. Buy 1GB, see if its works for you, if it doesn’t, buy another GB. Upgrading takes 2 min and will not void your warranty. (True for Acer, Dell and HP)
A DVD burner comes as standard on most systems.
Buy the biggest battery you can afford. A system is only as good as long as its stays on!...
Right there... There are a lot of good options in that range...Mo";p="55556 wrote: ...I’d say 45-50k is a better budget...
If that's the case then Rusty, you should go for a desktop... more options, cheaper buy in, easier & cheaper upgrades and cheaper to replace parts as & when required...TenX";p="55564 wrote:Since Mack The Knife will mostly be using the laptop in lieu of his desktop, I suppose he will be using it at home, most of the time plugged on![]()
...or check your mails in a coracle using a wireless internet connection.Mack The Knife Bana";p="55593 wrote: I prefer to sit on the balcony surrounded by trees rather than brick walls.![]()
Thanks for all the useful info Mo. Can you tell me what is wrong with studio series?Mo";p="55556 wrote: If choosing Dell, steer clear of the new studio line. Look for the Inspiron or Vostro. Both the series have systems within your budget and suiting the work.