Changing my handgun?

Posts related to handguns (pistols, revolvers)

Which one to choose?

Poll ended at Sat Oct 04, 2008 12:10 am

Colt 357 Magnum Revolver
14
64%
Beretta 81FS .32 Pistol
8
36%
 
Total votes: 22

msandhu
One of Us (Nirvana)
One of Us (Nirvana)
Posts: 376
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 4:47 am
Location: Philadelphia, PA, USA

Re: Changing my handgun?

Post by msandhu » Sat Sep 27, 2008 12:57 am

i would vote for .357 colt.
.32 is good for plinking but for personal defence, its definately .357 colt since its got much better stopping power
Cheers
Mandeep

For Advertising mail webmaster
User avatar
HydNawab
One of Us (Nirvana)
One of Us (Nirvana)
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:12 pm
Location: Hyderabad

Re: Changing my handgun?

Post by HydNawab » Sat Sep 27, 2008 1:01 am

Its not a calibre, its where you aim.

I hope you agree.I know the 357 Mag is a great calibre for self defence and it feels great firing it.
'It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but only 3 for proper trigger squeeze'.

'You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone.'

-- Al Capone

User avatar
mundaire
We post a lot
We post a lot
Posts: 5410
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 5:53 pm
Location: New Delhi, India
Contact:

Post by mundaire » Sat Sep 27, 2008 1:01 am

HydNawab";p="54139 wrote:The 357 ammo is about Rs.300-400 a piece.
So that's less than 2 times the price of imported .32 ACP ammo. BTW have you ever considered reloading your ammo? Dies and other equipment are available overseas and you could potentially reload at a much much cheaper price than even the KF factory loaded ammo... it would involve some effort and learning from your side though...

Cheers!
Abhijeet
Like & share IndiansForGuns Facebook Page
Follow IndiansForGuns on Twitter

FIGHT FOR YOUR RIGHTS - JOIN NAGRI NOW!

www.gunowners.in

"Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire." -- Robert Heinlein

sitar
Almost at nirvana
Almost at nirvana
Posts: 247
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 8:41 pm
Location: delhi, m.p.

Post by sitar » Sat Sep 27, 2008 1:02 am

stopping power?????

you just have to stop

not to stop permanently
Irrespective of the direction of the wind, the smoke from the cigarette will always tend to go to the non-smoker.

User avatar
HydNawab
One of Us (Nirvana)
One of Us (Nirvana)
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:12 pm
Location: Hyderabad

Re: Changing my handgun?

Post by HydNawab » Sat Sep 27, 2008 1:02 am

Abhijeet,

Never really thought of that.Will search it up on the web.

Cheers

Ashar
'It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but only 3 for proper trigger squeeze'.

'You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone.'

-- Al Capone

Mack The Knife
We post a lot
We post a lot
Posts: 5775
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 6:23 pm

Re: Changing my handgun?

Post by Mack The Knife » Sat Sep 27, 2008 1:04 am

The 357 ammo is about Rs.300-400 a piece.If I shoot 100 rounds a year, 2L would only last me a max of 5 years.Thats Rs.30,000-40,000 a year for ammo.
Ever thought of using snap caps to practice and reduce your live ammo expenditure?

User avatar
HydNawab
One of Us (Nirvana)
One of Us (Nirvana)
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:12 pm
Location: Hyderabad

Re: Changing my handgun?

Post by HydNawab » Sat Sep 27, 2008 1:04 am

Oh yes.Sitar, believe me, they stop once they know you have a gun and run like hell when you cock it.Speaking from personal experience!
'It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but only 3 for proper trigger squeeze'.

'You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone.'

-- Al Capone

james
One of Us (Nirvana)
One of Us (Nirvana)
Posts: 347
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 1:30 am
Location: INDIA

Re: Changing my handgun?

Post by james » Sat Sep 27, 2008 1:09 am

HI, Ashar , my vote goes for COLT 357, shooting in range to me is like addiction and are similar to Drinks. The kick that 357 gives is worth keeping , .32 is daily affair ,as far as defence is concerned , colt 357 is compact , faster first shot, loud and out of croud .
THE only diadvantage i feel is in case under some unfortunate situation and after shoot-out , if some kind of advance bullet test is carried out and it can be concluded that this killing shot is 357 then due to limited 357 , identifing the shooter would be easy .
This is highly critical analysis of practical situation but as far as KICK is concerned only COLT 357....
Cheers ,James...

msandhu
One of Us (Nirvana)
One of Us (Nirvana)
Posts: 376
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 4:47 am
Location: Philadelphia, PA, USA

Re: Changing my handgun?

Post by msandhu » Sat Sep 27, 2008 1:24 am

HydNawab";p="54145 wrote:Its not a calibre, its where you aim.

I hope you agree.I know the 357 Mag is a great calibre for self defence and it feels great firing it.
Hydnawab,
I agree with u that aim is more important that the caliber and there is plenty of time to take that aim while target practicing. But lets say in a situation ( personal defense) where u need to quickly react, there isn't usually that much time to take that good aim at the right spot . In such a situtation, its the caliber that can play an important role in stopping the attacker.

Looking forward to hear your thoughts on this.

regards
mandeep

mashh1
Almost at nirvana
Almost at nirvana
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Location: pakistan

Re: Changing my handgun?

Post by mashh1 » Sat Sep 27, 2008 1:45 am

well Ashar last time my suggestion was to keep both of your guns and it is still same but as you mentioned your financial constraints, my vote goes for Colt. it is a fine revolver in a respected caliber and as you mentioned yourself, that if you are not a peace officer,usually gunfights not last more than a cylinder full of rounds and it is a well documented fact.
A revolver has a very simple manual of arms as compared to any Auto and this is a very major factor in a self defense scenario as you have less things to fumble with in a life or death situation. although you will have less ammo with your Colt option but you will need less practice as there is no SA/DA trigger, no safety. when i carried the bigger brother of your Beretta a 92 FS. i was always struggling to master the transition between 1st double action and later single action trigger pull. i can always shoot better when there is consistent trigger and so do a lot of other people i know. well these are my 2 cents.
regards

User avatar
HydNawab
One of Us (Nirvana)
One of Us (Nirvana)
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:12 pm
Location: Hyderabad

Re: Changing my handgun?

Post by HydNawab » Sat Sep 27, 2008 1:46 am

Mandeep

I have to agree on that one.The situation forces me to.Sometimes I think you just have to BANG.I guess most people who are presented with this kind of a scenario just keep firing and hope something hits the target.

But yes, I do agree with you.

Cheers

Ashar
'It takes 43 muscles to frown and 17 to smile, but only 3 for proper trigger squeeze'.

'You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone.'

-- Al Capone

mashh1
Almost at nirvana
Almost at nirvana
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Location: pakistan

Re: Changing my handgun?

Post by mashh1 » Sat Sep 27, 2008 1:56 am

Ashar are 38 special is a PB on your side, IIRC 38 S&W or 38/200 is a PB. if you can manage to get some 38 specials, you can manage the magnum's flash & recoil. and they certainly cost less.
regards

User avatar
mundaire
We post a lot
We post a lot
Posts: 5410
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 5:53 pm
Location: New Delhi, India
Contact:

Post by mundaire » Sat Sep 27, 2008 2:07 am

mashh1";p="54157 wrote: Ashar are 38 special is a PB on your side, IIRC 38 S&W or 38/200 is a PB. if you can manage to get some 38 specials, you can manage the magnum's flash & recoil. and they certainly cost less.
regards
.38 Special is a NPB, but from what I have heard they are harder to source than .357 mags... so I would imagine they may actually prove to be more expensive! The Indian (legal) arms market is truly and completely devoid of any and all logic... :P
Like & share IndiansForGuns Facebook Page
Follow IndiansForGuns on Twitter

FIGHT FOR YOUR RIGHTS - JOIN NAGRI NOW!

www.gunowners.in

"Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire." -- Robert Heinlein

TenX
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1902
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 3:19 pm
Location: Bangalore, INDIA
Contact:

Post by TenX » Sat Sep 27, 2008 7:25 am

mundaire";p="54158 wrote: ...The Indian (legal) arms market is truly and completely devoid of any and all logic... :P
.. Have to agree on this :)
Never Shave without a Blade
.......^___________________^
....../ '---_________________ ]
...../_==O;;;;;;;;_______.:/
.....),---.(_(____)/.....
....// (..) ),----/....
...//____//......
..//____//......
.//____//......
..-------

TwoRivers
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1526
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 1:11 pm
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska

Post by TwoRivers » Sat Sep 27, 2008 7:39 am

No Sitar, the idea is to stop HIM from stopping YOU. And the .357 Mag will do a much better job of that than a .32 ACP. You want to stop him NOW, with the first hit, not after he has done serious damage to you.The .32 ACP probably has less "stopping power" than a .22 RF hollow point. So, ammunition price and availabilty aside, the .357 would win hands down. Cheers.

Post Reply