Fishing with bows, crossbows, rifles

Got some old "Shikaar" tales to share? Found a great new spot to Fish? Any interesting camping experiences? Discussion of Back-packing, Bicycling, Boating, National Parks, Wildlife, Outdoor Cooking & Recipes etc.
Forum rules
PLEASE NOTE: There is currently a complete ban on Hunting/ Shikar in India. IFG DOES NOT ALLOW any posts of an illegal nature, and anyone making such posts will face immediate disciplinary measures.
Post Reply
ronish
On the way to nirvana
On the way to nirvana
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 2:36 am
Location: kerala

Fishing with bows, crossbows, rifles

Post by ronish » Wed Aug 20, 2008 12:46 pm

abhijeet, and what about the cross bow, here in my area many use custom made cross bows on snake heads (murrels). its damn powerful & accurate.l. i also own one,which is unused for many years.is this illegal?

For Advertising mail webmaster
User avatar
perazzi
Almost at nirvana
Almost at nirvana
Posts: 178
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 12:22 pm
Location: New Delhi ( India )

Re: Fishing with rifles

Post by perazzi » Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:02 pm

Ronish Hi ,

Whereabouts are ye from ?
I have also heard about murrell being shot with rifles !

Rohit.
Heart of a Lion , Memory of an Elephant

User avatar
OverUnderPump
Shooting true
Shooting true
Posts: 695
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 11:23 pm
Location: Bangalore, Denmark
Contact:

Re: Fishing with rifles

Post by OverUnderPump » Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:05 pm

perazzi wrote: I have also heard about murrell being shot with rifles !
Rohit.
Scenario: 30-06 on murrel, Instant fish paste :lol: . Poor visibility in water + refraction adds up to one helluva shooter, would like to be under his tutelage. Who's the man ?

That said, give me a line or a net any day.

regards
8)
OUP
The universe was born with a BIG BANG, no wonder guns run in my blood.

Disclaimer: My post is either a question or a reply to one. I am stating an opinion. If my opinion differs from yours, It's not intended as an insult.

ronish
On the way to nirvana
On the way to nirvana
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 2:36 am
Location: kerala

Re: Fishing with rifles

Post by ronish » Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:10 pm

perazzi wrote:Ronish Hi ,

Whereabouts are ye from ?
I have also heard about murrell being shot with rifles !

Rohit.
It's true mate, old muzzle loaders still work on big murrels, pellets must be in limited numbers otherwise PASTE" as quoted by OUP.

ronish
On the way to nirvana
On the way to nirvana
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 2:36 am
Location: kerala

Post by ronish » Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:19 pm

OverUnderPump wrote:Scenario: 30-06 on murrel, Instant fish paste :lol: . Poor visibility in water + refraction adds up to one helluva shooter, would like to be under his tutelage.Who's the man ?

That said, give me a line or a net any day.

regards
8)
OUP
OUP, time to take shot is the split of a second when the fish come to the surface for air gulping, so no refractive error.

User avatar
perazzi
Almost at nirvana
Almost at nirvana
Posts: 178
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 12:22 pm
Location: New Delhi ( India )

Re: Fishing with rifles

Post by perazzi » Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:46 pm

OverUnderPump wrote:Scenario: 30-06 on murrel, Instant fish paste . Poor visibility in water + refraction adds up to one helluva shooter, would like to be under his tutelage.Who's the man ?

That said, give me a line or a net any day.

regards

OUP
The only negative about this forum is that a lot of guys , lots of times , just talk through their hats not really knowing jack shit.

Rohit.
Heart of a Lion , Memory of an Elephant

User avatar
mundaire
We post a lot
We post a lot
Posts: 5410
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 5:53 pm
Location: New Delhi, India
Contact:

Re: Fishing with rifles

Post by mundaire » Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:58 pm

ronish wrote:abhijeet, and what about the cross bow, here in my area many use custom made cross bows on snake heads (murrels). its damn powerful & accurate.l. i also own one,which is unused for many years.is this illegal?
Bows & crossbows require no license.
OverUnderPump wrote: Scenario: 30-06 on murrel, Instant fish paste :lol:
OUP even a powerful calibre (like the 30-06) will loose most of its energy on hitting water. I don't recall the exact distances but I think they completely loose their effectiveness within as little as 4-5 feet or so... will try and see if I can dig out details on real life studies conducted...

Have never tried it, but heard quite a few stories from people who have used the .315 for "fishing"...

Cheers!
Abhijeet
Like & share IndiansForGuns Facebook Page
Follow IndiansForGuns on Twitter

FIGHT FOR YOUR RIGHTS - JOIN NAGRI NOW!

www.gunowners.in

"Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire." -- Robert Heinlein

User avatar
mundaire
We post a lot
We post a lot
Posts: 5410
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 5:53 pm
Location: New Delhi, India
Contact:

Post by mundaire » Wed Aug 20, 2008 2:09 pm

OK, not really an authoritative study but got an experiment conducted by the Mythbusters team. http://kwc.org/mythbusters/2005/07/myth ... water.html
The next gun up was the M1, which shoots at 2800 ft/s. In their Bulletproof Glass mythbusting, the M1 was capable of penetrating 2.5" of bulletproof glass.

* M1@ 10 ft: tiny bullet fragments once again
* M1@ 2 ft: the bullet only pierced the gel 4", which would be enough to just pierce the skin.

They finally broke out the big gun, the .50 cal with armor-piercing rounds, which are shot at 3000 ft/s.

Adam: "Hopefully we'll be gone before the pool fully drains"

* .50 cal @ 10 ft: even though the water exploded, the ballistics gel was intact. Water made it all the way up to the ceiling. As it was with the previous guns, the bullet round came apart on impact. It lost all of it's energy within the first 3 ft. You would be safe 14" underwater at a 23 angle from a .50 cal.

confirmed: you can protect yourself from a bullet by diving underwater. If the shooter were directly overhead, you would probably be safe from most guns at 8 ft. At a 30 degree angle, you would only have to be 3 ft underwater to be safe.
Like & share IndiansForGuns Facebook Page
Follow IndiansForGuns on Twitter

FIGHT FOR YOUR RIGHTS - JOIN NAGRI NOW!

www.gunowners.in

"Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire." -- Robert Heinlein

User avatar
OverUnderPump
Shooting true
Shooting true
Posts: 695
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 11:23 pm
Location: Bangalore, Denmark
Contact:

Post by OverUnderPump » Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:26 pm

mundaire wrote:OK, not really an authoritative study but got an experiment conducted by the Mythbusters team. http://kwc.org/mythbusters/2005/07/myth ... water.html
Nice read that, now I know jack sh1t :D .Doubly difficult to shoot fish then eh' ? I'll still prefer a line or a net.

regards
8)
OUP
The universe was born with a BIG BANG, no wonder guns run in my blood.

Disclaimer: My post is either a question or a reply to one. I am stating an opinion. If my opinion differs from yours, It's not intended as an insult.

lazybones
One of Us (Nirvana)
One of Us (Nirvana)
Posts: 324
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:18 pm
Location: bangalore

Post by lazybones » Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:03 pm

Shooting at water with a firearm is a really dangerous practice. Hit the right angle and the slug will skip off the water like a stone and will be lethal for many hundred yards.

Ashok

Post Reply