NON-PROHIBITED ARMS ---Applications to be normally allowed
![Arrow :arrow:](./images/smilies/icon_arrow.gif)
The correct interpretation of section-13.14 & 15 of the Arms Act is that every application for the non-prohibited weapon must normally be allowed, and this must be done within 3 months of filing of the said application. If the application is rejected.this must be done only in very exceptional cases for good reasons recorded in writing and communicated to the applicant within 3 months of the application.
Whenever an application for a non-prohibited arm is made.and it is not disposed of within 3 months. it will be deemed to have been allowed on the expiry of 3 months.
HIGH COURT GENERAL DIRECTIONS---Application to be decided within 3 months--
![Arrow :arrow:](./images/smilies/icon_arrow.gif)
The High court issued a general direction to all concerned authorities that whenever any application for licence under the Arms Act is made the same must be processed and decided within 3 months and the normal rule must be grant of the licence in the case of non-prohibited fire-arms, and refusal should be the exception and for strong reasons to be recorded in writing after giving opportunity of hearing to the applicant,and such reasons for rejection must be communicated to the applicant within 3 months of the application. The licence should also be normally not restricted to the district or state except for special reasons to be recorded in writing and communicated to the applicant.
LICENCE FOR A PARTICULAR DISTRICT
![Arrow :arrow:](./images/smilies/icon_arrow.gif)
The authorities often give licences valid for only a particular district. This is arbitrary. a person needs protection whereever he goes,and it is not that once he goes out of his district he is safe.
GANESH CHANDRA BHATT v DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ALMORA (1993) 21 ALR 300.
hock ann,