Ricochet
-
- Almost at nirvana
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:31 pm
- Location: nasik maharashtra
Ricochet
Can a rifle shot ricochet from water surface......?
if a rifle shell will ground say after 1200 meters, will it still fly only 1200 meters before it grounds after ricochet.?
what are legal implications of any injury sustained by ricochet shell.?
please educate.
regards
if a rifle shell will ground say after 1200 meters, will it still fly only 1200 meters before it grounds after ricochet.?
what are legal implications of any injury sustained by ricochet shell.?
please educate.
regards
- Vineet
- Veteran
- Posts: 1428
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:09 am
- Location: Punjab
Re: Ricochet
Yes, it depends on angle but bullet can ricochet, skid off or bounce off on water.
Haven't understood what you want to say. Looks like you are calling the 'bullet' as 'shell'.casual shooter wrote: ↑Tue Nov 17, 2020 5:20 pmif a rifle shell will ground say after 1200 meters, will it still fly only 1200 meters before it grounds after ricochet.?
The shooter is completely responsible for any injury occurred as a result of ricochet, negligent discharge, accidental discharge or aerial firing.casual shooter wrote: ↑Tue Nov 17, 2020 5:20 pmwhat are legal implications of any injury sustained by ricochet shell.?
In aerial firing injury, the shooter is difficult to trace as the injured person and shooter may be more than one kilometer away from each other.
Below is the example of stray bullet taking a life but the shooter was arrested by police. https://www.google.com/amp/s/indianexpr ... arty/lite/
Vineet Armoury
Arms, Ammunition & Accessories.
Arms, Ammunition & Accessories.
-
- Almost at nirvana
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:31 pm
- Location: nasik maharashtra
Re: Ricochet
Relates to distance travelled by bullet is it same after ricochet..
-
- Almost at nirvana
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:31 pm
- Location: nasik maharashtra
Re: Ricochet
Relates to distance travelled by bullet is it same after ricochet..
Thank you Vineet for information, and knowledge
Regards
Thank you Vineet for information, and knowledge
Regards
-
- Shooting true
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:40 am
Re: Ricochet
Yes but a rifle shot can deviated or deflect after hitting or touching any surface.casual shooter wrote: ↑Tue Nov 17, 2020 5:20 pmCan a rifle shot ricochet from water surface......?
if a rifle shell will ground say after 1200 meters, will it still fly only 1200 meters before it grounds after ricochet.?
what are legal implications of any injury sustained by ricochet shell.?
please educate.
regards
If a rifle shot is having a range of 1200 mtrs and on its path it hit any object or surface then on the aforementioned process it will lose energy and bound to decease in it's total range.
If any injury sustained by any person from a recochet or deviated or deflected bullet or slug then the responsibility will be on the shooter for sure but to the best of my knowledge it will fall under injury caused by unintentional action.
Best example is famous USA lake shooting incident where the bullet deflected on the water surface and then it reach to a nearby shooting sports facility where it again reflect after hitting celling and then hit a sports person on his head and cause death. On This incident a discovery episode was also made.
Regards
Regards
Shivaji
Shivaji
- timmy
- Old Timer
- Posts: 3027
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:03 am
- Location: home on the range
Re: Ricochet
Bullets ricocheting from the surface of water has an interesting history.
During the days of sailing ships and smoothbore blackpowder cannon, British Admiral Nelson would have his gunnery aim somewhat short (about 2/3rds or so) of the enemy ships, and skip cannonballs into the sides of the enemy. It was this skip principle that led Barnes Wallis, the famous British engineer (he designed the R-100 dirigible, Vickers Wellesley and Wellington bombers, and the powerful supersonic Tallboy and Grand Slam bombs, to name a few things), to conceive of the "skip bombs" used to destroy the Ruhr dams during WW2. When asked about his idea of using skip bombs, Wallis specifically credited Nelson.
The American Army Air Corps, during the Pacific War with Japan, also used skip bombing against Japanese ships.
During the days of sailing ships and smoothbore blackpowder cannon, British Admiral Nelson would have his gunnery aim somewhat short (about 2/3rds or so) of the enemy ships, and skip cannonballs into the sides of the enemy. It was this skip principle that led Barnes Wallis, the famous British engineer (he designed the R-100 dirigible, Vickers Wellesley and Wellington bombers, and the powerful supersonic Tallboy and Grand Slam bombs, to name a few things), to conceive of the "skip bombs" used to destroy the Ruhr dams during WW2. When asked about his idea of using skip bombs, Wallis specifically credited Nelson.
The American Army Air Corps, during the Pacific War with Japan, also used skip bombing against Japanese ships.
“Fanaticism consists of redoubling your efforts when you have forgotten your aim.”
saying in the British Royal Navy
saying in the British Royal Navy
-
- Almost at nirvana
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:31 pm
- Location: nasik maharashtra
Re: Ricochet
yes interesting and they were also known as dam busters, there was a BBC documentary also on this but they were like big balls , which would reverse swing and sink just near the wall of the dam and burst...
-
- Almost at nirvana
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:31 pm
- Location: nasik maharashtra
Re: Ricochet
I think looking at the logic, if one practices at a licensed range and then if the bullet ricochets then it will be considered as an accident . more of an issue with FMJ bullets, not with lead loads.
cheers
cheers
- timmy
- Old Timer
- Posts: 3027
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:03 am
- Location: home on the range
Re: Ricochet
I think it depends on the range. All of the ranges I've used have a thick dirt backstop that rises quite high above the target level. A stray shot coming from any of those ranges would mean negligence on the part of the shooter, by shooting over the backstop somehow. Or, if a person is out shooting in the country without a proper backstop, again they'd be liable.
If the range doesn't have the proper backstop, then I suppose someone could find them liable for a loose round.
I recall an incident about 10 years back, when someone in a trailer home had a 50 BMG bullet hit their trailer. It had evidently come from a range that was in the vicinity. 50 BMG has quite a range! No culprit was ever found.
Yes, the Barnes Wallis dam buster bombs were drum shaped and carried by specially modified Lancasters. The bomb was spun by a hydraulic motor before being dropped, imparting a back spin relative to the direction it traveled as it skipped to the dam. This avoided torpedo netting deployed to protect the dam and ensured that it rolled down the face of the dam, exploding close to the back surface of it.
I've seen that BBC documentary. There's also a movie from the 50s starring Michael Redgrave and Richard Todd that's pretty good.
If the range doesn't have the proper backstop, then I suppose someone could find them liable for a loose round.
I recall an incident about 10 years back, when someone in a trailer home had a 50 BMG bullet hit their trailer. It had evidently come from a range that was in the vicinity. 50 BMG has quite a range! No culprit was ever found.
Yes, the Barnes Wallis dam buster bombs were drum shaped and carried by specially modified Lancasters. The bomb was spun by a hydraulic motor before being dropped, imparting a back spin relative to the direction it traveled as it skipped to the dam. This avoided torpedo netting deployed to protect the dam and ensured that it rolled down the face of the dam, exploding close to the back surface of it.
I've seen that BBC documentary. There's also a movie from the 50s starring Michael Redgrave and Richard Todd that's pretty good.
“Fanaticism consists of redoubling your efforts when you have forgotten your aim.”
saying in the British Royal Navy
saying in the British Royal Navy
- Rakshith
- Learning the ropes
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2020 9:59 pm
Re: Ricochet
Technically, it can. And yes, you will be held accountable. That's why it's so important to know exactly where you're shooting and ensuring you have either sufficient clearance or backstop.
- eljefe
- Old Timer
- Posts: 2871
- Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 3:37 am
Re: Ricochet
.22 soft lead Bullets are notorious for bouncing off water. I’ve seen it happen.
The skip effect of cannon balls on land was known to 18 &19 century artillerymen both here and in Europe. There is a very graphic description by an English infantry man, chronicled in a book, of the damage and mutilation caused by Sikh artillery during the Anglo Sikh wars.
How far will a ‘normal’ rifle bullet go AFTER a ricochet? Direction, speed and velocity dependant. Your guess is as good as mine.
The skip effect of cannon balls on land was known to 18 &19 century artillerymen both here and in Europe. There is a very graphic description by an English infantry man, chronicled in a book, of the damage and mutilation caused by Sikh artillery during the Anglo Sikh wars.
How far will a ‘normal’ rifle bullet go AFTER a ricochet? Direction, speed and velocity dependant. Your guess is as good as mine.
''It dont mean a thing, if it aint got that zing!''
"...Oh but if I went 'round sayin' I was Emperor, just because some moistened bint lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away..."
"...Oh but if I went 'round sayin' I was Emperor, just because some moistened bint lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away..."
- Rakshith
- Learning the ropes
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2020 9:59 pm
Re: Ricochet
Whoa. I can only imagine the skip effect of cannon fire. That must have been utterly terrifying.
- nagarifle
- Old Timer
- Posts: 3404
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 1:43 pm
- Location: The Land of the Nagas
Re: Ricochet
just remember that a bullet never misses nor is there such a thing as a bullet missed. it always hits something or the other. firer beware
Nagarifle
if you say it can not be done, then you are right, for you, it can not be done.
if you say it can not be done, then you are right, for you, it can not be done.