Big Daddy wrote:GNV wrote:Today I opened the gun and found that the Price reflects the quality of the internals. The worst part is the piston. The piston rod is off center and not concentric with the piston. The spring is of very poor quality. Spring guide sucks. All three parts need to be replaced to make this gun good.
Hi GNV,
I was also surprised when I opened my SE. However, I did not have any complaints on the quality of the internals, perhaps except the spring and the trigger blade (which is personal. I do not like triggers with rolled sheet metal)
https://www.indiansforguns.com/viewtopi ... =2&t=23543
In my post you can see the the piston post polishing (13th pic) The piston rod also was bang on......
Perhaps lethargy has crept in.
Let me know if you need a piston made. Can have one made.
BD
Dear Joy,
Thank you very much for your kind offer. I got this Apache for a friend of mine who is also a cocoa plantation owner. A couple of months ago he shot my air guns and was thoroughly hooked and wanted me to get one for him. This is his first AR. So I wanted to get him an economical but good AR so that he could learn and later graduate to better ARs. I loaned him my Hurricane for the time being to keep him peaceful. I could not loan him my SX- ORION let alone the NP ORION
. Since he preferred heavier AR I ordered the Apache otherwise I would have ordered the lighter SDB SPORT. At present I don't want to change the Piston. But remember your offer. I may call on you later. Also you made two more offers to me. You know them. And I am keeping them in reserve and may call on you in near future
.
I think when the manufacturers present a prototype air gun or any other product it represent the basic shape of an idea and mainly for feedback before finalizing the design. From that feedback of suggested changes or modifications by the reviewer they take into account only changes suggested that they can implement or they want to implement. And then make a few final prototypes of the production rifle. If the final design is free of any fault the final prototypes would be perfect guns because they make them taking best of care in every stage while making them. If one could get one of them they would be lucky.
My above theory holds good only if the final design is completely flawless. Then when commercial production starts the product would not be made with the same care taken while making the final prototype.There would be inevitable initial MISTAKES while manufacturing them ( like in the earlier PH air guns ). They would be noticed and rectified and hopefully good guns start coming out of the factory.
Then after some time lethargy creeps in. And the results would be ........ bad.
If I am the manufacturer of this gun I would most probably start to think like this whenever I notice a bad part has been used. I had designed and made a good gun at a great price. It is already the best in its price range. Why discard a part for the sake of one gun. Most probably it would never get noticed. How many of the buyers of my guns open them and look at the internals. May be 25%. and how many of them would know the part is bad. only a handful. And how many of them would care to complain. Most probably none. They would probably have custom parts made and use them. And most definitely enjoy doing it calling it TUNING and boast about it to everybody who want to do it to their guns. In fact I am doing the air gun nuts a great favor and helping them to enjoy their hobby by providing them guns with a couple of badly made parts. They should be thankful to me instead of complaining about it. So everybody is happy in the end.
If indeed some idiot who does not appreciate the favor I am doing them do complain I could always replace the gun or claim that, that idiot himself damaged that part. After all I had not given any warranty against manufacturing defects. He purchased it at his own risk. and so.... on.
I am in a pretty bad mood right now. So I had better stop.
Regards,
GNV