Testing INSAS

[marksmanlko]

I am not too sure about it, I personally feel that the SLR is better, the only disadvantage the SLR suffers from is that it doesnt fire automatic or continous rounds at a single pull of a trigger.......................

So what's the test results, what did you test actually . ... ?

I mean , range , accuracy , reliability , handling , durability , approved , disapproved and your findings - Haji

i am not an expert in it but what i felt is as follows. I have explained few points in layman language
insas /slr
Type:Assault rifle/battle rifle - desi conclusion- situations demanding close combat
and hosing out many bullets with the feel to
overcome multiple targets with precision when
each second counts then i would prefer to hv
insas. If killing is the only option, you have
a big army to replace ya ,you are
in distant safer location & the
bullet decides the rule then SLR.

weight:4 Kg or lesser/around 5 kgs -though small but important during stealth ops
rate of fire : practical experience: i felt that INSAS had better rate of fire and what people call it as three round burst as it was well-focused, controlled and could be grouped easily on specific or multiple targets giving time to overcome the collective recoil of the burst. Whereas SLR is good but i never got a chance to test its sustained fire part.

Length: 37.8 inch 46.46 inch :: Lambi gaddi tak to modne me problem aawe hai jhe to
rifle hai. .English - Lesser Torque is needed to operate
INSAS during quick action emergency making it user-friendly.
The ability of INSAS to injure instead of killing immediately won its use in civilian control as well. This might be having some use in reducing the cost factor of bullets for government by replacing 7.62X51 nato cartridges by smaller ones and also using the same for police/army..
for any interdiction weapon of choice depends upon
1)skill,strength,stamina and intellect of the soldier
2)distance, defense (armour) and deployment (positioning and number) of defenders
Therefore, for semi-skilled soldier the rifle should be INSAS, dushman zyada hai to INSAS, dushman kareeb hai to INSAS. This is what i inferred from my experience but the expert members could suggest better. If distance and killing is concerned then there are better options available than SLR to get equipped
I also heard somewhere that the Government is preparing to replace INSAS with something better

[loner]

I am not too sure about it, I personally feel that the SLR is better, the only disadvantage the SLR suffers from is that it doesnt fire automatic or continous rounds at a single pull of a trigger.......................

So what's the test results, what did you test actually . ... ?

I mean , range , accuracy , reliability , handling , durability , approved , disapproved and your findings - Haji

i am not an expert in it but what i felt is as follows. I have explained few points in layman language
insas /slr
Type:Assault rifle/battle rifle - desi conclusion- situations demanding close combat
and hosing out many bullets with the feel to
overcome multiple targets with precision when
each second counts then i would prefer to hv
insas. If killing is the only option, you have
a big army to replace ya ,you are
in distant safer location & the
bullet decides the rule then SLR.

weight:4 Kg or lesser/around 5 kgs -though small but important during stealth ops
rate of fire : practical experience: i felt that INSAS had better rate of fire and what people call it as three round burst as it was well-focused, controlled and could be grouped easily on specific or multiple targets giving time to overcome the collective recoil of the burst. Whereas SLR is good but i never got a chance to test its sustained fire part.

Length: 37.8 inch 46.46 inch :: Lambi gaddi tak to modne me problem aawe hai jhe to
rifle hai. .English - Lesser Torque is needed to operate
INSAS during quick action emergency making it user-friendly.
The ability of INSAS to injure instead of killing immediately won its use in civilian control as well. This might be having some use in reducing the cost factor of bullets for government by replacing 7.62X51 nato cartridges by smaller ones and also using the same for police/army..
for any interdiction weapon of choice depends upon
1)skill,strength,stamina and intellect of the soldier
2)distance, defense (armour) and deployment (positioning and number) of defenders
Therefore, for semi-skilled soldier the rifle should be INSAS, dushman zyada hai to INSAS, dushman kareeb hai to INSAS. This is what i inferred from my experience but the expert members could suggest better. If distance and killing is concerned then there are better options available than SLR to get equipped
I also heard somewhere that the Government is preparing to replace INSAS with something better

I don't know what to say, one of us must be under influence right now

The ability of INSAS to injure instead of killing immediately won its use in civilian control as well. This might be having some use in reducing the cost factor of bullets for government by replacing 7.62X51 nato cartridges by smaller ones and also using the same for police/army..

INSAS can kill just as well as SLR, a well placed shot from both 5.56 and 7.62x51 will kill you instantly, on the other hand a shot in the leg by both round won't kill anyone instantly. The cost of ammo is not high to justify adopting a new cartridge since the government manufactures their own ammo. They replaced the SLR because .308 WInchester is difficult to control in full auto without proper training and good physical build. INSAS will do better at close quarter due to it's ire superiority but at long range it won't be effective as SLR. BTW INSAS mags break very easily, and if you break one, they'll deduct 700 rupees from your paycheck

Sorry if my language was kinda harass, I'm currently under the influence of painkillers as I fall on my knee yesterday and ruined my athletic career permanently.

[marksmanlko]

@Loner

lol !!
camo part was a copy paste from wiki & previous post was what i really felt while using it as i tested it once only
Had i been using it on regular basis then i might have posted something better
rest yer puns r welcome

[loner]

BTW I never touched an INSAS before and the story of me falling on my knee wasn't a joke either. Now I'm keyboard /k/ommando for a month at least
I've sent you a request on facebook, we can discuss our off topic matters there instead of derailing the thread. Good review BTW

[marksmanlko]

BTW I never touched an INSAS before and the story of me falling on my knee wasn't a joke either. Now I'm keyboard /k/ommando for a month at least
I've sent you a request on facebook, we can discuss our off topic matters there instead of derailing the thread. Good review BTW

it was nice chatting with ya on fb. Kindly add me on my other id http://www.facebook.com/ching.chongchang.33