Testing INSAS

[marksmanlko]

PQAAAK_Xb2fEIMtDuJLwRxXcp-mFlsTHEKep7lkIoXvt0sX4sA3GmWv4pZzvK1CyWyMINf86eW_wxkfndTMKODaLM7UAm1T1UJOlAqoPX8KgSEvcvF_gf4WGT6eG.jpg

PQAAAHQmPoXcX_gqY1OCwfPsLVmg2zpisS0ZM-6zgj_KcMfxt-vYhnMr7Gi9BNAbVsPe99t9QrLOX_j021saMQpa098Am1T1UJIVtc1_Eci7xk6o83V9wrOCtFEA.jpg

The primitive village area was a perfect place simulating something out of "Call of Duty ps3 series"
But the real feel or recoil and the three dimensional damage to the target is something which could never be simulated as reality.
It is an INSAS Standard Assault Rifle using 5.56X45 mm NATO ammunition. This rifle is based on the Kalashnikov AK-47 action with modifications. The basic gas-operated action (long stroke gas system, rotating bolt, and stamped steel receiver) is of the Kalashnikov pattern. The gas system is fitted with a manual gas regulator similar in design to that found on the FN FAL as well as a gas cutoff. The charging handle is positioned on the left side of the forearm; it is similar in position and design to the German HK G3 rifle. . The stock, handle and front support of this gun has a unique forest camo which blends well in darker maps such as Brushwood or Dark Forest . In terms of statistics, the gun is very effective, with high accuracy, average damage and superb rate of fire. With the same amount of stopping power as the M416 and fast fire rate, the INSAS Rifle is an effective choice at close ranges. Despite this, the INSAS Rifle also excels at medium to long ranges because of the pre-attached scope and high accuracy.
Found it a Little crude as compared to AK47 but the accuracy part is better for short range. I tested its accuracy only upto 25-30 mts estimated and found it to be comparatively better than 47.

Rest info awaited.

[xl_target]

Cool Beans!
So how did you come to test it?

[Ravi1000]

I am not too sure about it, I personally feel that the SLR is better, the only disadvantage the SLR suffers from is that it doesnt fire automatic or continous rounds at a single pull of a trigger.......................

[xl_target]

I am not too sure about it, I personally feel that the SLR is better, the only disadvantage the SLR suffers from is that it doesnt fire automatic or continous rounds at a single pull of a trigger.......................

Ravi,
the SLR is very hard for most people to control in full auto. The rifle is almost overpowered by the cartridge. Keep in mind the original design envisioned a lot smaller cartridge, an assault rifle cartridge if you must. The 7.62 X 51 chambering was a compromise to accommodate sales to NATO. The SLR is a battle rifle and the INSAS is an assault rifle. Still, the SLR is a fine rifle just as its parent the FAL is.

See Skyman's post about Battle rifles HERE

[gladiatorgarg]

INSAS is quite an accurate rifle if its zeroed properly, i av achieved first shot hit at 100 yrds at a single brick with my service wpn n the brick was in 3parts,evn SLR can be modified to be fired in auto but as already been said its recoil is quite a handful n accuracy is also poor in auto mode..i hope our more learned n esteemed seniors can enlighten us more about this..

[loner]

SLR can be modified to be fired in auto

And you just need a file to do so. Hope ATF won't declare the Century imported Ishapore L1A1 as machineguns

INSAS is quite an accurate rifle if its zeroed properly, i av achieved first shot hit at 100 yrds at a single brick with my service wpn n the brick was in 3parts

MoB (Minute of Brick) isn't a great accuracy, when you compare it to AR15/M16 which can give 1/2 MoA, even 1/4 MoA.
Still if it can hit a human head upto 200 yards, it's a good assault rifle.

[gladiatorgarg]

okk loner let me try with insas next time let me see what it /we can achieve n so far as machine gun is concerned my fav 7.62 its awesome...

[Ravi1000]

I am not too sure about it, I personally feel that the SLR is better, the only disadvantage the SLR suffers from is that it doesnt fire automatic or continous rounds at a single pull of a trigger.......................

Ravi,
the SLR is very hard for most people to control in full auto. The rifle is almost overpowered by the cartridge. Keep in mind the original design envisioned a lot smaller cartridge, an assault rifle cartridge if you must. The 7.62 X 51 chambering was a compromise to accommodate sales to NATO. The SLR is a battle rifle and the INSAS is an assault rifle. Still, the SLR is a fine rifle just as its parent the FAL is.

See Skyman's post about Battle rifles HERE

Thanks friend, the only knowledge and experience i have with these weapons are during my three year NCC period. I havent touched guns since then...........................

[loner]

the SLR is very hard for most people to control in full auto. The rifle is almost overpowered by the cartridge. Keep in mind the original design envisioned a lot smaller cartridge, an assault rifle cartridge if you must. The 7.62 X 51 chambering was a compromise to accommodate sales to NATO. The SLR is a battle rifle and the INSAS is an assault rifle. Still, the SLR is a fine rifle just as its parent the FAL is.

You lie see here
Compton style drive by with it

[boris]

I am not too sure about it, I personally feel that the SLR is better, the only disadvantage the SLR suffers from is that it doesnt fire automatic or continous rounds at a single pull of a trigger.......................

Ravi,
the SLR is very hard for most people to control in full auto. The rifle is almost overpowered by the cartridge. Keep in mind the original design envisioned a lot smaller cartridge, an assault rifle cartridge if you must. The 7.62 X 51 chambering was a compromise to accommodate sales to NATO. The SLR is a battle rifle and the INSAS is an assault rifle. Still, the SLR is a fine rifle just as its parent the FAL is.

See Skyman's post about Battle rifles HERE

Very true sir,i'd say the same for the G3 not so great in full auto.

[Hammerhead]

So what's the test results, what did you test actually . ... ?

I mean , range , accuracy , reliability , handling , durability , approved , disapproved and your findings - Haji

[marksmanlko]

Cool Beans!
So how did you come to test it?

Thnx Sir !!! just few contacts.. As u know is behind everything in India

So many years of Freedom but we don't feel it !!!

[loner]

Thnx Sir !!! just few contacts.. As u know is behind everything in India

So many years of Freedom but we don't feel it !!!

Hook a brother up man

[The Doc]

The stock, handle and front support of this gun has a unique forest camo which blends well in darker maps such as Brushwood or Dark Forest .

Can't see Camo any where .

best,
Rp.

[loner]

Doc that's the uber secret camo, it only activates when the gun is inside a forest