Thanks for commenting. It was a lot of fun.
Baljit,
It's great to see that this organization encourages whole families to attend. There were a few young kids there.
![Image](http://www.roundhouseinc.org/images/1022/patches.jpg)
Here the three youngest members received a special patch for attending.
You and I would be more than happy with service like that. I was on the Ruger forums and some guy sent a 50 year old Ruger 10/22 in to Ruger and asked them to restore it. They did it for free; re-bluing the barrel and replacing the stock, the trigger assembly and the barrel band with brand new parts. They even paid the shipping both ways!!!Mark wrote:Thanks for the update, it is quite nice when a US company cares about the customers!
I had that rifle along with me but there was a lady who needed a rifle so I let her use it. I used my replacement rifle for this shoot, even though it doesn't group as well as the older one. The difference between the two is marginal.feedramp wrote:xl_target,
Is that the same 10/22 that gave good groups after all these years in out of box condition? You posted about it in rimfirecentral.
Here is what I've learned from working in retail (an experience that I did not care for at all, but a paycheck is a paycheck regardless of the size and whether one likes the work or not):Guess what? He's whining that they didn't re-anodize his old parts and send them back to him. Foreget that they haven't used anodizing on their 10/22 parts for over 30 years. I swear some people here have become so entitlement minded that they will whine and cry even when someone does something nice for them, for free.
I guess it is the luck of the draw. For example, there were complaints about the receiver on recent 10/22's. Apparently as the molds wear down, the top of the receiver starts to get a hump. When this happens a gap is visible between the supplied scope mount rail and the top of the receiver. It really seems to be cosmetic but you know how picky gun owners are. The receiver they sent me was from a brand new number series (serial number) so when I installed the scope rail it fit perfectly with no visible gap. New mold? However, the shape of the receiver is not that important unless the barrel/receiver fit is loose. There is a lot of room in the receiver for the bolt to move around. If the recoil spring were not holding it in place, it would rattle around quite a bit.timmy wrote:XL: Let me get this straight: your old 10/22 shoots better than your new 10/22 (marginally, I guess?). So, they shipped you a new receiver, you installed the barrel into it, buttoned it all up, and then it still shot better than your new one?
If that is the case, it seems to reflect what I've read and heard: the accuracy of the 10/22 and 22 rifles in general depend on how the chamber is cut, and the accuracy of the rifle depends on the luck of the draw, regarding the condition of the chamber reamer on the assembly line.
I think that this also speaks very well of Ruger's system of retaining the barrel with V blocks. In many guns (the SKS, for instance), there are versions with the barrels shrink-fitted and pinned to the receiver and ones where the barrel is threaded. Most of us gun nuts prefer or even demand the threaded barrel, feeling that there is something inherently less capable with a press/pinned/clamped barrel to receiver system.
At least the way Ruger does it, this is apparently not the case at all!
Would that be how you interpret your experience?
Dev, if we meet, that's a promise.dev wrote:Hi Xl,
I had noticed the rifleman's badge on your id and was wondering whether you had won it. Very well done, someday when we meet I shall learn how to shoot like that from you.