Muzzle loader accident
-
- Learning the ropes
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:49 am
- Location: Hyderabad
- Contact:
Muzzle loader accident
[liveleak]4d0_1334213066[/liveleak]
[youtube][/youtube]
[youtube][/youtube]
When only cops have guns, it's called a "police state".
-- Robert A. Heinlein.
-- Robert A. Heinlein.
- timmy
- Old Timer
- Posts: 3027
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:03 am
- Location: home on the range
Re: Muzzle loader accident
In the second video, it appears that the shooter simply held the flintlock too close to his body and got a spray of burning powder from the flash pan on his clothes.
Regarding the first video, I don't think one is supposed to shoot the ramrod along with the bullet... I'll bet he'll check next time.
Regarding the first video, I don't think one is supposed to shoot the ramrod along with the bullet... I'll bet he'll check next time.
“Fanaticism consists of redoubling your efforts when you have forgotten your aim.”
saying in the British Royal Navy
saying in the British Royal Navy
-
- On the way to nirvana
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 6:47 am
Re: Muzzle loader accident
It looks like the ramrod in the first video is lying on the shooting bench, albeit not stowed back under the bore.
Pretty catastrophic failure...
Pretty catastrophic failure...
- ramtiger
- One of Us (Nirvana)
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 7:49 pm
- Location: Tamilnadu
Re: Muzzle loader accident
what causes the failure in first video ?
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 1526
- Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 1:11 pm
- Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Re: Muzzle loader accident
No way to tell from the video. If the ramrod had been left in the bore, resting on top of the bullet, it would simply have shot out. Heck of a recoil, though. Smoke does not seem to be enough for black powder, he's probably using a black powder substitute. But without knowing all the details, we can only guess. Could be a double load, one load atop the other.ramtiger wrote:what causes the failure in first video ?
- Hammerhead
- Shooting true
- Posts: 607
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 6:52 am
- Location: Toronto
Re: Muzzle loader accident
No it's hang fire, left a space between the ball and powder to create an extra chamber effects, bad accident btw- Hajiramtiger wrote:what causes the failure in first video ?
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
-
- On the way to nirvana
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 9:58 pm
- Location: yavatmal
Re: Muzzle loader accident
no in the first video there was too much power more than the weapon could handle poor scope though and a sure life threateningly embarrassing situation
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 1526
- Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 1:11 pm
- Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Re: Muzzle loader accident
Haji, that's not what a hangfire is. "Hangfire" is delayed ignition, and it doesn't blow up a gun. Also, with black powder, that effect with a bullet not seated on the charge, has never been able to be duplicated.Hammerhead wrote:No it's hang fire, left a space between the ball and powder to create an extra chamber effects, bad accident btw- Hajiramtiger wrote:what causes the failure in first video ?
Slow burning smokeless with a partial charge, as in a magnum cartridge, can do that on occasion. But not a muzzle loader. Note, though, that it looks as if he were using a black powder substitute.
-
- Eminent IFG'an
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 1:55 pm
- Location: Mongoli
Re: Muzzle loader accident
That looks like a in- line M/l such as those made by Savage and Remington, and those are usually extremely strong and safe designs.
Since the source of failure appears to emanate from the breech area, possible causes of the failure could be:
> Wrong powder, most likey cause, fast burning powder such as pistol/shotgun powder used.
> Substantial overcharge of powder used, and for a slower powder the pressures would not manifest themselves towards the breech but rather closer to the muzzle.
> Material failure, least likely cause, given the QC the product would have to pass plus the compulsory proofing.
Fortunately it seems there is no serious injury to the shooter.
One cannot emphasize enough on use of adequate eye protection in using any firearm although in this extreme case, one could loose one's hand/fingers and injury to the face is a distinct possibility.
That said, Muzzle Loaders that use black powder and a properly sealed breech area are generally safer on account of the lower pressures that black powder generates.
Since the source of failure appears to emanate from the breech area, possible causes of the failure could be:
> Wrong powder, most likey cause, fast burning powder such as pistol/shotgun powder used.
> Substantial overcharge of powder used, and for a slower powder the pressures would not manifest themselves towards the breech but rather closer to the muzzle.
> Material failure, least likely cause, given the QC the product would have to pass plus the compulsory proofing.
Fortunately it seems there is no serious injury to the shooter.
One cannot emphasize enough on use of adequate eye protection in using any firearm although in this extreme case, one could loose one's hand/fingers and injury to the face is a distinct possibility.
That said, Muzzle Loaders that use black powder and a properly sealed breech area are generally safer on account of the lower pressures that black powder generates.
- snIPer
- Veteran
- Posts: 1664
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 12:06 pm
Re: Muzzle loader accident
From the video it seems that there is nothing exiting from the muzzle, in fact i dont even see it smoking so quite possibly the final packing / shot has got stuck there and thus caused pressures to increase and explode.
/S/
/S/
On my Epitaph - Off to Happy Hunting Grounds.