Muzzle loader accident

Discussions related to firearms that do not fit in anywhere else.
Post Reply
furqan
Learning the ropes
Learning the ropes
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:49 am
Location: Hyderabad
Contact:

Muzzle loader accident

Post by furqan » Fri Apr 13, 2012 4:25 am

[liveleak]4d0_1334213066[/liveleak]

[youtube][/youtube]
When only cops have guns, it's called a "police state".
-- Robert A. Heinlein.

For Advertising mail webmaster
User avatar
timmy
Old Timer
Old Timer
Posts: 3027
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:03 am
Location: home on the range

Re: Muzzle loader accident

Post by timmy » Fri Apr 13, 2012 5:20 am

In the second video, it appears that the shooter simply held the flintlock too close to his body and got a spray of burning powder from the flash pan on his clothes.

Regarding the first video, I don't think one is supposed to shoot the ramrod along with the bullet... I'll bet he'll check next time.
“Fanaticism consists of redoubling your efforts when you have forgotten your aim.”

saying in the British Royal Navy

PeterTheFish
On the way to nirvana
On the way to nirvana
Posts: 89
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 6:47 am

Re: Muzzle loader accident

Post by PeterTheFish » Fri Apr 13, 2012 6:56 am

It looks like the ramrod in the first video is lying on the shooting bench, albeit not stowed back under the bore.

Pretty catastrophic failure...

User avatar
ramtiger
One of Us (Nirvana)
One of Us (Nirvana)
Posts: 393
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 7:49 pm
Location: Tamilnadu

Re: Muzzle loader accident

Post by ramtiger » Fri Apr 13, 2012 8:31 am

what causes the failure in first video ?

TwoRivers
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1526
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 1:11 pm
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska

Re: Muzzle loader accident

Post by TwoRivers » Fri Apr 13, 2012 11:36 pm

ramtiger wrote:what causes the failure in first video ?
No way to tell from the video. If the ramrod had been left in the bore, resting on top of the bullet, it would simply have shot out. Heck of a recoil, though. Smoke does not seem to be enough for black powder, he's probably using a black powder substitute. But without knowing all the details, we can only guess. Could be a double load, one load atop the other.

User avatar
Hammerhead
Shooting true
Shooting true
Posts: 607
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 6:52 am
Location: Toronto

Re: Muzzle loader accident

Post by Hammerhead » Sat Apr 14, 2012 1:17 am

ramtiger wrote:what causes the failure in first video ?
No it's hang fire, left a space between the ball and powder to create an extra chamber effects, bad accident btw- Haji
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke

savage
On the way to nirvana
On the way to nirvana
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 9:58 pm
Location: yavatmal

Re: Muzzle loader accident

Post by savage » Sat Apr 14, 2012 3:16 am

no in the first video there was too much power more than the weapon could handle poor scope though and a sure life threateningly embarrassing situation :oops: :oops: :oops:

TwoRivers
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1526
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 1:11 pm
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska

Re: Muzzle loader accident

Post by TwoRivers » Sat Apr 14, 2012 7:02 am

Hammerhead wrote:
ramtiger wrote:what causes the failure in first video ?
No it's hang fire, left a space between the ball and powder to create an extra chamber effects, bad accident btw- Haji
Haji, that's not what a hangfire is. "Hangfire" is delayed ignition, and it doesn't blow up a gun. Also, with black powder, that effect with a bullet not seated on the charge, has never been able to be duplicated.
Slow burning smokeless with a partial charge, as in a magnum cartridge, can do that on occasion. But not a muzzle loader. Note, though, that it looks as if he were using a black powder substitute.

skeetshot
Eminent IFG'an
Eminent IFG'an
Posts: 236
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 1:55 pm
Location: Mongoli

Re: Muzzle loader accident

Post by skeetshot » Sat Apr 14, 2012 12:25 pm

That looks like a in- line M/l such as those made by Savage and Remington, and those are usually extremely strong and safe designs.

Since the source of failure appears to emanate from the breech area, possible causes of the failure could be:

> Wrong powder, most likey cause, fast burning powder such as pistol/shotgun powder used.

> Substantial overcharge of powder used, and for a slower powder the pressures would not manifest themselves towards the breech but rather closer to the muzzle.

> Material failure, least likely cause, given the QC the product would have to pass plus the compulsory proofing.

Fortunately it seems there is no serious injury to the shooter.

One cannot emphasize enough on use of adequate eye protection in using any firearm although in this extreme case, one could loose one's hand/fingers and injury to the face is a distinct possibility.

That said, Muzzle Loaders that use black powder and a properly sealed breech area are generally safer on account of the lower pressures that black powder generates.

User avatar
snIPer
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1664
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 12:06 pm

Re: Muzzle loader accident

Post by snIPer » Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:10 pm

From the video it seems that there is nothing exiting from the muzzle, in fact i dont even see it smoking so quite possibly the final packing / shot has got stuck there and thus caused pressures to increase and explode.
/S/
On my Epitaph - Off to Happy Hunting Grounds.

Post Reply