Owning Prohibited Weapons.

Discussions on the Right to Keep and Bear Arms.
Post Reply
suraj2087
On the way to nirvana
On the way to nirvana
Posts: 94
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:53 am
Location: Faridabad

Owning Prohibited Weapons.

Post by suraj2087 » Wed Dec 15, 2010 4:47 pm


For Advertising mail webmaster
User avatar
essdee1972
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1195
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 5:54 pm
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra

Re: Owning Prohibited Weapons.

Post by essdee1972 » Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:09 pm

Quoting "...include people who live in areas where terrorists are active and face a "grave and imminent threat to their lives", government officials who, due to the nature of their job, have made themselves targets in the eyes of terrorists, MPs/MLAs, private citizens and family members of people who have been associated with anti-terrorist programmes."

Very funny statement. Terrorists are active in Mumbai & Delhi also, does that mean everyone (private citizens) in these cities will be considered for PB license? After so many years of denying them even NPB licenses? What does "imminent" threat mean? A chap chased by a terrorist will run to the head cop and ask for a license?

Same list of suspects - sarkari babus (due to the nature of their job ROTFL ), their relatives (any cop can say he was associated with anti-terrorist programmes, hence his father-in-law's fifth cousin needs a gun), and our great politicos (who, inspite of spending huge amounts of our taxes on security guards, still need personal guns for protection - an ironic comment on the quality of the security guards??)....

The second article is typical journalism - print sensational headlines, some half-baked facts...voila! Why is there no attempt to link private gun ownership with rates of violent crime? because it would have proved guns in hands of civvies is a good thing? And comparing US and Yemen? errr... yeh baat kuchh hazam nahin hui... :lol:

Chicken and egg problem - has the ToI gone crazy first or the government???
Cheers!

EssDee
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
In a polity, each citizen is to possess his own arms, which are not supplied or owned by the state.Aristotle

Get up, stand up, Stand up for your rights. Get up, stand up, Don't give up the fight.Bob Marley

User avatar
mundaire
We post a lot
We post a lot
Posts: 5410
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 5:53 pm
Location: New Delhi, India
Contact:

Re: Owning Prohibited Weapons.

Post by mundaire » Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:19 pm

It is NOTHING but the very same MHA Arms Policy/ Executive order which we have been fighting against since the begining of this year. :roll:

They have merely "presented" it to the court wording it so that it seems that what they are doing will actually make things better for "ordinary citizens" - unfortunately many will actually believe it! :evil:
Like & share IndiansForGuns Facebook Page
Follow IndiansForGuns on Twitter

FIGHT FOR YOUR RIGHTS - JOIN NAGRI NOW!

www.gunowners.in

"Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire." -- Robert Heinlein

Anand
Shooting true
Shooting true
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:29 am
Location: Hyderabad

Re: Owning Prohibited Weapons.

Post by Anand » Thu Dec 16, 2010 9:43 am

Just saw the article this morning in Times of India, as Abhijeet said, its the same stuff! Only the wording has been made to look like its common man friendly :roll: . The way it is worded will have most people believe that in fact, a whole lot of new people have become "eligible" for PB firearms! This is simply not true.
Anand

captrakshitsharma
Shooting true
Shooting true
Posts: 728
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 12:36 am
Location: Dehradun, Delhi ,Gurgaon
Contact:

Re: Owning Prohibited Weapons.

Post by captrakshitsharma » Thu Dec 16, 2010 10:48 am

A huge pile of BS.... probably MHA's well thought out plan to divert attention... I am halfway through a reply to the editor regarding the same.
I dont dial 911... I dial .357

andy_65_in
Shooting true
Shooting true
Posts: 709
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 11:57 am
Location: Dehradun,Uttarkhand

Re: Owning Prohibited Weapons.

Post by andy_65_in » Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:12 pm

Its holy crap- i do come across people struggling to get even one arm licence then how come this move.just BAKWAS :evil:

thomast1
Almost at nirvana
Almost at nirvana
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 6:07 pm
Location: Bangalore, Karnataka

Re: Owning Prohibited Weapons.

Post by thomast1 » Thu Dec 16, 2010 1:15 pm

Babu-speak, its time the word enters all dictionary in the world. MHA would be hiring seasoned Babus for these i guess. If the right info has to be publicised then its going to take good efforts! nothing short of the NRA model..

Thomas

Post Reply