Though this is dated 2007, in the hunting world there is a lot of talk about the beginning of polar bear hunts in 2011.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/16/world ... polar.html
VANKAREM, Russia — Here on the frozen edge of the country’s Arctic expanse, where a changing climate has brought polar bears into greater contact with people, Russia has embraced a counterintuitive method of trying to preserve the creatures: hunting them, legally.
Polar bears and villages like Vankarem are in closer contact now.
For the first time since the Soviet Union banned the practice more than five decades ago, the government is preparing to allow hunters here to kill the bears. The animals are descending with greater regularity on coastal villages in this part of Russia’s far north as a result of shrinking sea ice generally attributed to a warming planet.
“The normal life space for the polar bears is shrinking,” Anatoly A. Kochnev, a biologist with the Pacific Scientific Research and Fisheries Center here in the Chukotka region, said in an interview. “They come in search of food on the shore, and the main sources of food are where people live.”
Even as many warn that the world’s polar bears are threatened, with the Bush administration proposing to include them on the United States’ listing of threatened species, scientists, environmentalists and native villagers here express hope that a legal hunt could rein in rampant poaching. If hunters are allowed to take at least some bears legally, the reasoning goes, they might be less tempted to break the law for the bear’s meat, consumed locally as an illicit delicacy, and for the thousands of dollars that pelts can fetch.
“It is like the Russian saying,” said Sergei Nomkymyn, a hunter in this village 80 miles north of the Arctic Circle, who favors a resumption of legal hunting that most here remember only from their elders’ tales. “The wolves would not be hungry, and the sheep would remain intact.”
Still, it remains to be seen whether the hunt can really reduce the poaching in a country with notorious corruption and lax enforcement of its own environmental rules.
The twin threats facing Russia’s polar bears — the recent warming of the Arctic climate and poaching — have put Vankarem and other villages along the coast of the country’s remote northeastern edge at the center of efforts to ensure the creatures’ survival.
The shrinking sea ice has hurt by putting the bears farther from their natural sources of food. And though poaching has been a longtime problem in an area where bear hunting was once a way of life, the habitat loss has made illegal hunting easier.
“When they are on the shore, they are in danger of being killed,” said Mr. Kochnev.
Although the number of bears killed illegally here is unclear, given the clandestine nature of poaching, the government estimates that as many as 100 are killed each year.
Mr. Kochnev said the number could be twice as high, an unsustainable blow to a regional population that roams from the northwestern coast of Alaska to the East Siberian Sea and has shrunk to as low as an estimated 2,000. (The worldwide population of polar bears is 20,000 to 25,000.)
The ban in Russia, which was imposed in 1956 after the population of bears experienced a sharp decline, will be lifted only partly to allow subsistence hunting by villagers in Chukotka, an impoverished, sparsely populated region across the Bering Strait from Alaska.
The hunt, officials here and in Moscow said, could resume as soon as this year or next, once a census is carried out and an annual quota that would not threaten the bears is set. In Alaska, the annual quota set by law has averaged roughly 40 a year.
Polar bears live mostly on sea ice, which they use as a platform for hunting seals, their main prey. With the floating Arctic ice cap shrinking in the summer to its smallest in possibly a century, the bears have had to swim longer distances to reach the seals, which stay closer to land.
Scientists say bears that come ashore in search of other food are also sometimes getting trapped there if the ice retreats farther offshore than before.
One result has been more contacts with humans as the bears of the Chukchi Sea migrate along the region’s northern coast until the winter ice freezes again. Last year that did not occur until early December.
The warming climate has not only endangered bears, it has also affected the lives of those who live here much more immediately than it has people in most parts of the world. Since 2003 there have been at least three fatal bear attacks in Chukotka.
In Vankarem, with 200 residents, most of them native Chukchi, the Arctic equivalent of a neighborhood watch program was created. The village has a patrol of hunters that monitors the bears’ arrival in autumn and tries to keep them out.
One attraction for the bears has been an increase in the number of walruses lingering onshore. A habitat for walruses is situated on a rocky spit at the edge of the village. Where once a few thousand walruses gathered in the summer and fall, there are now tens of thousands, an increase that scientists also attribute to the reduction of the sea ice where walruses typically gather.
The carcasses of those that die naturally on the shore attract hungry bears. Last year, for the first time, the “bear patrol,” as it is known here, collected 80 of the carcasses and hauled them by tractor to an abandoned Soviet-era military post about five miles outside of Vankarem. Over a two-week period in November and December, the patrol counted 96 bears that fed at the collection spot.
“In the autumn, there were as many polar bears as dogs,” Fyodor Tymityagin, a hunter here who is part of the patrol, said.
Sergei I. Kavry, the patrol’s 35-year-old leader, said that the oversight protected the villagers from attacks and the bears from poaching. After the two weeks, the sea froze and the well-nourished bears headed north onto the ice.
“Vankarem was encircled by bears,” he said, “but by happy bears.”
Under a treaty reached with the United States in 2000 and approved by the Senate last December, a joint commission, advised by scientists from both countries, would oversee any legal hunt and establish quotas for native villagers on both sides of the Bering Strait.
Vladimir V. Mikhailov, an ethnic Russian who has lived in Vankarem for 20 years, said he did not think the legal hunt would stop illegal killings.
“You cannot place a policeman with every bear or with every hunter,” he said after a town hall meeting held here in early April to discuss the plans for resuming the official hunt.
Mr. Kavry, like many here, supports the resumption of a legal hunt, saying it would restore a tradition forced underground after the Soviet ban went into effect. The polar bear, he and others said, was central to Chukchi culture, a source of legends and, in an inhospitable climate, a source of food.
“It’s not just for the sake of killing,” said Pavel Yentynkeu, who lives in Nutepelman, a village to the east. “It’s for the meat.” He described preparing bear as pelmini, Russia’s version of dumplings.
“One big male would be enough for the entire village,” he said. “Not like the poachers. When they kill a bear, only two or three families know.”
Resuming the hunt has the support of Russia’s most prominent bear researchers and, more grudgingly, of groups like the World Wildlife Fund. “We support effective management,” said Viktor Nikiforov, the fund’s director of regional programs in Russia. “If this hunting is a small part of this, then we can accept it.”
Stanislav E. Belikov of the All-Russian Research Institute for Nature Protection in Moscow, who has written many of the rules for the resumption of the hunt, said the threat of climate change and poaching made urgent measures necessary.
“In 50 years,” he said at the town hall meeting, “we may only be able to tell our grandchildren that these creatures existed here.”
