You mean if we were to fly in different Aircrafts MoA would choose pilot with 100 hours of flying experience and I will choose one with 10000



Speaking of wavelength ,I think I do catch yours!
I see that some of our friends do not agree with MoA's statement about flinching.Bespoke wrote:Anyone who knows anything about shooting any kind of firearms and has a sensible head on his shoulders knows that the flinch decreases with time and practice not the other way round..MoA wrote: You can develop a flinch with any caliber. Shoot enough and I can pretty much guarantee you will develop one with a high recoiling caliber.
Special note for upcoming shooters from Mr MoA
"Please don't shoot too much for coming competitions or you will develop a flinch"
Cleared the ground in front of the muzzle for several feet. Dug up and blew old shell cases tumbling along the ground for yards towards the target and ripped the grass up as though it had been cut at the roots.
A TOTALLY VILE CALIBRE !
That is why I have 20 posts and you have 1000+ .MoA wrote:Shooter/Vikram,
No point in arguing with keyboard shooters. Its easier and every one gets groups in the zeros. Someone who doesnt understand the difference between wearing out a a barrel and blowing one up, isnt worth it.
Before I lower myself to your level and lower the tone of a public forum like you already haveMoA wrote: The problem with fighting people in the gutter is they pull you down to their level and beat you with experience.
OK lets look at things simply.Bespoke wrote:Vikram and Eljefe,
Thank you for your comments.
I feel it comes down to individual.There are people who would learn from their mistakes and learn and there are people who wont learn,It is simple law of nature the more you do something the better you get at it and ones shooting skills are no different.
Vikram the videos you posted are kind of flinches comes from you naturally because we are humans the way you pull your trigger and brains sensory reactions and these are very negligible.The flinch as one can clearly read my first post can make out that when a person is sacred of the recoil..the recoil can in fact hurt him more.
Since the replier to that post did not has anything to argue on the facts of the post got down to pick up a word and tried to twist it.
That is why I have 20 posts and you have 1000+ .
Before I lower myself to your level and lower the tone of a public forum like you already have
Note: Request to Moderator to check the language in quoted post and if you think its appropriate.I will post my reply soon.
I have much better things to do than read and pay attention to "YOUR" posts.Thank youMoA wrote:
You seem to have no idea about shooting. Including what a big bore might be. If you had paid attention you would know I shoot the 45-70 at ranges you wouldnt know the target is at. Or what a BP bullet might do. Do you know without a search on Google the performance of a 485 grain bullet over 64.5 grains of fffg between a 200 and 300 yard target?
When did i say .375 HH is my beloved? Its an Incomplete question since you did not mention bullet weight and type but in any case it has much flat trajectory then your 45-70.MoA wrote: Or how your beloved 375 HH will do between your average 20 yard zero and 1000?
I was merely answering your query about keyboard shooter.It was you who raised the question.MoA wrote: On Post counts... so if you are more active it is bad?
You mean real meaning of "flinch" or your version?MoA wrote: Do you even know what a flinch is?
.300 WM recoil free?? I think i missed where i said that can you please remind me?MoA wrote:Ever shoot a .300 WM which in your books is a pea shooter; free recoil?
wh@r*s and dogs challenge people too often then kind of language you used in one of your posts revealed everything about your background and education so its not a surprise.If one call's for a challenge infront of people you give our name ,locations details etc...I don't share that information either but nor do i challenge people in every second postMoA wrote:I will call you out with what ever big bore your have, and shoot them better than you can.
Get me banned on this forum. I dont care, and I actually challenge you.
Bickering apart, Bespoke, in fairness, there is no word play in either MoA's or el Jefe's posts but scientific and verifiable FACTS. We do not doubt your experience but your understanding of your experience needs to be discussed. Both MoA and el jefe are not self-proclaimed experts.They ARE experts. Both own variety of guns and shot/still shoot many more than people like me can only aspire to and I shot some.Bespoke wrote:Eljefe,
1)As far as note to Moderators is concerned it wrote that the tone of this forum should not be lowered not because i am not capable of defending myself but since moderators thought the language was appropriate i chose to post my reply.It was not hard for me to write some crappy words right away
2)Inspite of your long techno babble I am sorry to say i will still go with my practical experience Thank you.I Still believe the more you shoot the better you will will be at shooting and recoil is not an issue if you know how told handle a firearm.
3) As far as my posts are concerned I have tried to keep them to the point.I am not a self proclaimed expert ( as quiet a few guys here are) but i do know a little about my stuff.
4) Since you mention playing with words i think your post is classic example.
5) The girls held her rifle as it should be.
6) You are no one to judge ,specially me.
With all due respect I am withdrawing from this forum.
1) I never said that they can be controlled!What I understand by 1 :
is that; the flinch can be overcome with out your NEGLIGIBLE sensory reaction from the brain? excuse me! everything, IS because of the brain, and I wouldnt label it NEGLIGIBLE.
If you could control the ' negligible ' sensory reactions of your brain, you could heal yourself from tumours (actually,have NO disease) slow /fasten up your heart rate by yourself,clear up clogged arteries and have no strokes or heart attacks (oh wow-bl**dy nirvana) and many other impossibles.
1) If this point is Laughable why is it that when you thought of begin a physician why did you go to college and most of all why did you do your internship? you should have started practicing it as soon as you thought you want to be a doctor?"...It is simple law of nature the more you do something the better you get at it..."
laughable.
If you start doing a physical /psychomotor action WRONG from the first time ,UNCORRECTED, after a 100 or 10,000 tries , you will still be doing it WRONG.Why? muscle memory develops and lulls the body into a false sense of compliance. (The few times you get it RIGHT is when the negligible brain sensory reactions took over and did the right thing.)
Why do you think coaches film their players?
Try a simple game of darts. Eyes asses space/distance trajectory etc, tell brain,which tells hand when / how much to raise, contract etc and release. ideally, with 'negligible sensory reaction', should go straight to the target,right? unfortunately, you forgot to hold your breath, or released on the 2nd beat of the heart, instead of BETWEEN the beats (yeah, if your brains sensory reactions were that negligible, you could do that, y'know)so 400 tries later, muscles know what to do WRONG, you've brained the barmaid half a dozen times, voila.
2. "...It is simple law of nature the more you do something the better you get at it..."
Pathetic
Flinch is a NATURAL defensive , bodily reaction, WRONG by our 'shooting' standards.It has to be visualised/witnessed, the degree of the fault established and a corrective method implemented.No, this is not from some QC handbook (though i have been through some major QC in my time ) Cant be corrected by shooting a 1000 rounds with a shoulder breaker,or a Anschutz match rimfire, in the delusional idea that all it takes is to correct a wrong is to REPEAT the wrong and be a 'mard'