Lee-Enfield No. 4 Rifle

[m24]

Source: http://www.americanrifleman.org/Article ... 2203&cid=8

LE4.jpg

In 1939, the British soldier was still armed with the same rifle his father, or perhaps even his grandfather, carried. The Short, Magazine Lee Enfield (SMLE) delivered sterling service from the mud of Flanders to the farthest reaches of the Empire. With Hitler’s war machine on the move, the British needed an accurate, mass-production rifle. Thanks to inter-war development, an improved and simplified design was waiting in the wings, and the No. 4 Mark I rifle was adopted on November 15, 1939.

The No. 4 Mk I, chambered in the same .303 British cartridge as the SMLE, retained the better features of the SMLE (in 1926 the SMLE was renamed the No. 1 rifle), but changes were made to the receiver, bolt, stock, sights, barrel, nose cap and bayonet. While being similar in appearance and features, very few parts were completely interchangeable between the No. 4 and No. 1. The No. 4’s receiver was strengthened and squared off; requiring less milling and simplifying manufacture. A simple one-piece charger bridge to accept five-round stripper clips was fitted into grooves on the top of the receiver, as opposed to the No. 1’s rounded bridge. The SMLE’s complex-to-manufacture nose cap was discarded in favor of a milled, and later stamped, front reinforcing band and a simplified sight guard. The No. 4 also had a heavier free-floating barrel, which protruded from the fore-end and eliminated the need for precision full-length bedding.

No. 4s had four types of aperture backsights. The Mk I micrometer backsight was made of milled steel with a battle sight set for 300 yards, which when flipped up was adjustable for elevation out to 1,300 yards. The Mk II had a simple, stamped, two-setting aperture sight. The Mks III and IV were also made from stampings, but, like the Mk I, had provisions for sighting from 300 to 1,300 yards.

New government ordnance factories set up to produce the No. 4 were Royal Ordnance Factory (ROF) Fazakerley in Lancashire and ROF Maltby in Yorkshire. Birmingham Small Arms (B.S.A.) Gun, a private company, also established B.S.A. Shirley in Birmingham to turn out the No. 4. All three began producing No. 4s in 1941. Despite its role in developing the design, the Royal Small Arms Factory Enfield did not produce any of the 2 million-plus No. 4 Mk Is made in England during the war.

In early 1941, while America was still officially neutral, the British Government contracted with Savage Arms Corp. to build 200,000 No. 4 rifles at the former J. Stevens Arms Co. factory in Chicopee Falls, Mass. After the entry of the U.S. into the war, Savage continued to make the No. 4 under the auspices of lend-lease agreements. The lend-lease Savage-made rifles were marked “U.S. Property.” Long Branch Arsenal, located near Toronto in Ontario, Canada, produced about 330,000 No. 4 Mk I and I* rifles. In sum total not only did North American orders bolster British production, but actually exceeded it during the war. The No.4 Mk I* was not actually adopted until 1946, despite being produced at the North American factories as early as 1941. The principal variation was in the method of bolt release. The bolt ribway had a new slot cut for the bolt head to be pivoted upward, out of the ribway. The machining at the rear of the ribway, the bolt-head catch, spring and plate were then no longer necessary.

le.jpg

Disassembly

Disassembly of the unloaded No. 4 Mk I begins with depressing the magazine catch (28) and removing the magazine (35). Open the bolt (10) and move it partially rearward, then depress the bolt release (25) and allow the breechbolt head (6) to ride on its rail over the release. Rotate the breechbolt head upward and draw the bolt assembly rearward and out of the receiver (31). For the No. 4 Mk I*, open the bolt and ease it backward until the breechbolt head lines up with the recess in the bolt guide rail, rotate the bolt head upward and remove the bolt to the rear. It may be necessary to flip the backsight (18) to allow the bolt head to clear the receiver on both the Mk I and Mk I*.

Turn the breechbolt head counterclockwise and off the breechbolt body. Twist the cocking piece (2) until it moves to the lower of its two notches, taking most of the compression off the mainspring (4). Turn out the slotted striker screw (1) on the rear of the cocking piece. The striker (5) is screwed into the cocking piece. There are two notches on either side of the striker’s shoulder about 1 inch down from the striker’s tip. To remove the striker, insert a takedown tool from the front until the projections on either side of its point engage the notches. Then, simply turn out the striker.

Fore-end (38) removal begins with unscrewing the front band swivel screws (41 & 43) and removing the two front barrel bands (40 & 44) and the front sling swivel (42). Next, turn out the front guard screw (36) and the rear guard screw (15), allowing the trigger guard (34) with the trigger (32) attached to be pulled off of the fore-end. The fore-end is now free to be pulled off the bottom of the barreled action. To remove the buttstock (53), flip up the buttplate’s (50) trap, insert a long-bladed screwdriver into the recess in the buttstock’s rear and turn out the stock bolt (48) and its washer (49). Reassembly is in the reverse order.

[prashantsingh]

Very informative post.
Probably the most popular English Rifle used by the Royal British Army and their forces in the other commonwealth nations.
We have all grown up seeing this rifle as part of the Army, NCC and the state Police forces.

[fantumfan2003]

Yes the No. 4 and the jungle carbine versions we saw in Sholay, the movie.
They have many of these with folding peep sight in police armouries across the country complete with WWII vintage ammo too. And some were made in the US and even Egypt....yes Sir.....

M.

[winnie_the_pooh]

even Egypt.

None were made there. BTW the majority of those with India are most probable Pakistani made

[timmy]

Both the SMLE and the No. 4 were/are great rifles. In my opinion, they were the best bolt action battle rifles from any country, and superior to the Springfield, Mauser, Steyr-Mannlicher, and even my beloved Mosin Nagants for this purpose.

Thanks for sharing the interesting write-up. I enjoyed it!

[m24]

More on Enfield L42A1: http://www.gunsandammo.com/content/the- ... eld?page=1

A very good read.

Regards

[nagarifle]

eh , there is the royal navy, royal air force but no royal british army, its just the British army. noting royal about it.

thanks mr m24, like the oldies as made of solid wood butt end and very useful when run out of ammo, unlike the modern day plastic, has a real good punch to it.

[m24]

Did you get to fire any in your days with the "Royal" British Army?? Something like the Lee-Speed that we saw the other day??

Regards

[prashantsingh]

[quote="nagarifle"]eh , there is the royal navy, royal air force but no royal british army, its just the British army. noting royal about it.

Royal Indian Military College. Dehradun . (now Rashtriya instead of Royal)
Royal Military Academy. Sandhurst
Corps of Royal Engineers
Royal Marines.

Who says there is nothing Royal about the British Army.

But you are correct Naga.....it "IS" the British Army.



So should I call it the "Royal Lee Enfield .303" LOL

[m24]

So should I call it the "Royal Lee Enfield .303" LOL

Don't do that chief, people would only further confuse it with the bike and say it's their new variant. Instead we'll call naga, The Royal Naga and leave the LE and the British Army as it is.

Regards

[prashantsingh]

Good point m24.

And here are some more of the NOT SO ROYAL British Army.

1.The 2nd Queen Victoria's own Rajpoot Light Infantry.
2. Royal Armoured Corps
3.Royal Tank Regt.
4.Royal Horse Guards
5.The Queen's Royal Hussars
6.Princess of Wale's Royal Regt.
7.Duke of Wellington's Regt.
8.Royal Regt. of Artillery.
9.Royal Gurkha Rifles.
and many many more .

Looks like everything else in the British Army is ROYAL.

Like Amitabh Bacchan says in one movie "Englisss is a vairy phunny language".............