http://in.news.yahoo.com/32/20091218/10 ... ed-ar.html
This is the most senseless and unlawful of all. Will the terrorists and criminals also submit their illegal weapons?The Centre has issued a directive that all licenced weapons in the NCR should be deposited at least six months before the start of the games, Gurgaon Police Commissioner Surjeet Singh Deswal told reporters here on Saturday.
By asking the affected licensed firearm holders to submit their firearms even when there is no valid case related to the misuse of firearm by them, I think following are being violated by government:
1) The very purpose of keeping a legal firearm for self protection is getting defeated.
2) By asking the legally owned firearms to be deposited, the right to self protection as allowed by Section 96 to Section 106 of the Indian Penal Code is getting infringed. And this very act of government by rendering the citizens incapable of effectively defending themselves, is a violation of right to life as guaranteed by Constitution's article 21.
3) By this order, the government by asking to deposit all legal firearms, is rendering law abiding citizens defenseless against random violent crime by terrorists and criminals. Government is indirectly saying that the citizens do not have the inalienable right to protect their life and property. Hence the violation of Article 21 of Constitution is confirmed.
4) Government is making an assumption that all legal firearm owners are prone to misuse their weapons, which is an affront to the law abiding citizens keeping legal firearms.
5) Government is making an assumption that terrorists and criminals are fully dependent on legally held firearms, whereas the data says just exactly the opposite.
6) The government is equating all legal firearm owners with criminals and terrorists, which is an affront to the law abiding firearm license holders.
7) The government is going against the very principles and objectives of Arms Act, on basis of which firearm licenses have been legally issued.
Any opinion by members conversant with the letters of law?