Who took this shot ?
- eternalme
- One of Us (Nirvana)
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:51 pm
- Location: Gurgaon
- Contact:
Who took this shot ?
6 inch dia target, 100yds away, the target was moving at 16 feet per second and rifle used .22LR.
There were no practice shots,First shot missed by 8 inch 5 o'clock, Almost Bulls eye second shot 2 o'clock.
There were no practice shots,First shot missed by 8 inch 5 o'clock, Almost Bulls eye second shot 2 o'clock.
ll====lll lll====ll
lll Subs lll
lll Subs lll
- eternalme
- One of Us (Nirvana)
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:51 pm
- Location: Gurgaon
- Contact:
Re: Who took this shot ?
No one has any guess I suppose,
It was infamous JFK assassination shot, I don't think Ostwalt had any training in that kind of shot placement.
So the question remains who took that shot?
It was infamous JFK assassination shot, I don't think Ostwalt had any training in that kind of shot placement.
So the question remains who took that shot?
ll====lll lll====ll
lll Subs lll
lll Subs lll
- eternalme
- One of Us (Nirvana)
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:51 pm
- Location: Gurgaon
- Contact:
Re: Who took this shot ?
I read it was .22LR , that is another thing that the rifle ostwalt was supposed to have was 6.5 Mannlicher-Carcano, and a full jacketed bullet was found on the stretcher as well.
How did the bullet decide to come out and land on the stretcher is anyones guess.
How did the bullet decide to come out and land on the stretcher is anyones guess.
ll====lll lll====ll
lll Subs lll
lll Subs lll
-
- Almost at nirvana
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 5:58 am
- Location: Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala
Re: Who took this shot ?
There is a Hollywood movie FULL METAL JACKET(1988) in which it is mentioned that the JFK killer was a marine
There are no limits to a man's curious intelligence if he is determined to succeed...
- raj
- Almost at nirvana
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 7:15 am
- Location: india
Re: Who took this shot ?
Found a video about it.It is a bit disturbing depicting the final head shot in close up & slow motion.
I dont think its good to post its link here.If any member still want to see it,i will PM its link.
Was a .22lr used??Because the video shows a very ugly gunshot wound which i doubt that a .22 can make.
Regards
Raj
I dont think its good to post its link here.If any member still want to see it,i will PM its link.
Was a .22lr used??Because the video shows a very ugly gunshot wound which i doubt that a .22 can make.
Regards
Raj
---I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be the one controlling it.
---"Slow is Smooth,Smooth is Fast"
---"Slow is Smooth,Smooth is Fast"
-
- Almost at nirvana
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 9:52 pm
- Location: NYC
Re: Who took this shot ?
The officially accepted version is that the weapon used was a 6.5 mm Carcano.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Ke ... tion_rifle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Ke ... tion_rifle
“To be both a speaker of words and a doer of deeds”- The Iliad.
- hamiclar01
- Shooting true
- Posts: 964
- Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 4:46 am
- Location: delhi
- Contact:
Re: Who took this shot ?
Nicholas Cage in THE ROCK was actually about to tell us who the killers were, when the end credits start rolling in. Damn!shadowphaxone wrote:There is a Hollywood movie FULL METAL JACKET(1988) in which it is mentioned that the JFK killer was a marine
"Stan, don't you know the first law of physics? Anything that's fun costs at least eight dollars."
-
- Almost at nirvana
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 9:52 pm
- Location: NYC
Re: Who took this shot ?
LOL. Yes. You got rid of 'ol Hamilcar's image eh?
“To be both a speaker of words and a doer of deeds”- The Iliad.
- hamiclar01
- Shooting true
- Posts: 964
- Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 4:46 am
- Location: delhi
- Contact:
Re: Who took this shot ?
..... if you hadn't mentioned .22LR I would have pressed the buzzer for Prithviraj Chauhan in the Raasoeternalme wrote:6 inch dia target, 100yds away, the target was moving at 16 feet per second and rifle used .22LR.
There were no practice shots,First shot missed by 8 inch 5 o'clock, Almost Bulls eye second shot 2 o'clock.
remember the mat chookey chauhan line
-- Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:28 pm --
yup. it was a pain to dust at weekends, and perpetual frown was frightening the birdsBJL wrote:LOL. Yes. You got rid of 'ol Hamilcar's image eh?
"Stan, don't you know the first law of physics? Anything that's fun costs at least eight dollars."
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 1644
- Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 8:08 pm
Re: Who took this shot ?
If you had 11 dots to the right of the cross hair.. it could be done.
With the carnaco... forget it..
With the carnaco... forget it..
- dev
- Old Timer
- Posts: 2614
- Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:16 pm
- Location: New Delhi
Re: Who took this shot ?
Wasn't me on a bad day .eternalme wrote:6 inch dia target, 100yds away, the target was moving at 16 feet per second and rifle used .22LR.
There were no practice shots,First shot missed by 8 inch 5 o'clock, Almost Bulls eye second shot 2 o'clock.
Dev
To ride, to speak up, to shoot straight.
Re: Who took this shot ?
Contemporary sources paint a different picture about Prithvi Raj Chauhan after his defeat at the hands of Mohammed Ghori.Off course we would like to believe Chand Bardai's Prithviraj Rasso as it exists today.It is more romantic.A lot similar to gap between facts and what people like to believe about the Kennedy assassination.
- hamiclar01
- Shooting true
- Posts: 964
- Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 4:46 am
- Location: delhi
- Contact:
Re: Who took this shot ?
true, hence I limited the quip topenpusher wrote:Contemporary sources paint a different picture about Prithvi Raj Chauhan after his defeat at the hands of Mohammed Ghori.Off course we would like to believe Chand Bardai's Prithviraj Rasso as it exists today.It is more romantic.A lot similar to gap between facts and what people like to believe about the Kennedy assassination.
not the Chauhan of history.hamiclar01 wrote: Prithviraj Chauhan in the Raaso
remember the mat chookey chauhan line
I am neither a sensationalist, nor a romantic. However, others disregard his actual end and chose to believe a fantasy, fine by me. As long as that does not involve smashing libraries, stopping trains, or setting fires to property (among other things) in the name of miffed sensitivity.
"Stan, don't you know the first law of physics? Anything that's fun costs at least eight dollars."