IOF .22 revolver

Posts related to handguns (pistols, revolvers)
Post Reply
User avatar
nagarifle
Old Timer
Old Timer
Posts: 3404
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 1:43 pm
Location: The Land of the Nagas

Post by nagarifle » Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:01 pm

well rahul lets take a brief look at .22

the cal. size we talk about ie .22, .32 etc, as you know but (what the people forget is the second part) ie .22 is 5.56 in die.

the part we tend to forget is the length ie you can have a 9MM in die and 18mm , 19mm and 21mm in length the longer the length the more powder is in it, thus the power is increased.

so a .22 for a revolver (standard) is not the same as .22 or 5.56 for the Nato rifles. As the Insa ammo is the same die 5.56 but the length is longer then hand gun ammo.

hope this is clear as mud.
Nagarifle

if you say it can not be done, then you are right, for you, it can not be done.

For Advertising mail webmaster
User avatar
Olly
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1160
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 6:08 pm
Location: Earth - GPS 28.35N; 77.12E

Post by Olly » Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:55 pm

nagarifle";p="61057 wrote: hope this is clear as mud.
Sure... this is as clear as mud to me... :D

pdn70
On the way to nirvana
On the way to nirvana
Posts: 59
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 9:49 pm
Location: lucknow india

Post by pdn70 » Tue Dec 09, 2008 4:30 pm

hi experts,
any news on steel chambered iof .22 revolver.
I think that the invention of the Bullet is the most remarkable event in the history of mankind. It has the power to ensure both Humanity and Inhumanity.

REGARDS, PDN.

User avatar
timmy
Old Timer
Old Timer
Posts: 3027
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:03 am
Location: home on the range

Re: Why IOF .22 revolver considered "insufficient fire

Post by timmy » Wed Dec 10, 2008 8:58 am

Rahul: Please consider: the bullet in a .22 long rifle weights 40 grains and will be traveling about 1100 feet per second out of a handgun barrel and closer to 1300 feet per second out of a rifle barrel.

For 5.56mm NATO, or what we call .223 over here, the bullet is a similar diameter, but it weighs from 55 to 70 grains. Out of a rifle barrel, it will be traveling about 3200 feet per second. If you remember that Energy = mass x velocity squared, you will note that all sorts of things happen when the velocity is doubled or tripled to the energy.

Also, the .22 bullet has barely enough energy to penetrate the body, which is lessened if it hits a bone.

On the other hand, the .223 bullet is traveling so fast that it sets up hydrostatic shock waves. In essence the bullet is going so fast that it pushes the liquids away in an explosive manner. This effect is easily seen by shooting a high velocity bullet into a plastic milk or soft drink bottle filled with water and capped tightly.

In addition to all of this mayhem, the military 5.56mm bullets are designed to be unstable. If they hit something, the bullet will tumble. The original bullet that designed to do this was the British .303. By tumbling, the bullet makes a far greater wound channel that it would by just traveling in a straight line through the body. This gives it much more chance to sever an artery or damage an organ.

There is no comparison between the .22 long rifle and high powered .22 caliber rounds for this reason.

BTW, the .22 long rifle bullet is actually about .221 in diameter, while most .22 caliber high powered rifle cartridges shoot a bullet that is .224 in diameter.

Also, the .22 long rifle uses the old style outside lubricated "heel bullet" that has been obsolete in almost every other cartridge. In the .22 long rifle, the base of the bullet that is inside the cartridge case is of a smaller diameter than the bore of the barrel and the mid section of the bullet. Other revolver rounds used to be made like this. For instance, the .38 Special actually uses a bullet of .357 diameter. In the old days, the ancestors of the .38 Special used a bullet that really was .38 in diameter and had a heel extending into the cartridge case. But lubricating the bullets outside was not as practical as having the soft lubricant in grooves that were inside the cartridge case. The .44 Magnum cartridge uses a bullet that is actually .429 in diameter for the same reason.

With the .22 long rifle, the bullet is slow enough that the outside waxy lubrication or a copper washing does a good enough job. However, for faster bullets, a better lubrication method was needed.

User avatar
raj
Almost at nirvana
Almost at nirvana
Posts: 179
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 7:15 am
Location: india

Re: Why IOF .22 revolver considered "insufficient fire

Post by raj » Wed Dec 10, 2008 10:46 am

i must compliment Mr. Timmy for his very de.scriptive and informative post...i must have cleared all the doubts of tht topic..
very well done Mr.Timmy!!!!!keep rocking!!!

regards
raj
---I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be the one controlling it.

---"Slow is Smooth,Smooth is Fast"

TenX
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1902
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 3:19 pm
Location: Bangalore, INDIA
Contact:

Post by TenX » Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:30 am

Yes indeed... very well put :)
Thanks...
Never Shave without a Blade
.......^___________________^
....../ '---_________________ ]
...../_==O;;;;;;;;_______.:/
.....),---.(_(____)/.....
....// (..) ),----/....
...//____//......
..//____//......
.//____//......
..-------

mhksmk
Learning the ropes
Learning the ropes
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 3:23 pm
Location: Mumbai

Post by mhksmk » Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:08 am

Is the .22 IOF Rev a Rim firing or a Centre firing guns?

penpusher

Re: IOF .22 revolver

Post by penpusher » Sun Dec 14, 2008 9:38 am

Rimfire

mhksmk
Learning the ropes
Learning the ropes
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 3:23 pm
Location: Mumbai

Post by mhksmk » Tue Dec 16, 2008 2:09 am

Penpusher, thanks.

User avatar
The Doc
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1253
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:25 am
Location: India.

Post by The Doc » Thu Dec 25, 2008 5:45 pm

firearmsmaster";p="41332 wrote: soon rfi is launching the steel body make 0.22 bore revolver................the sample piece is already ready and it is under the process of testing
Any updates gentlemen ??

RP.

PS. Can the threads be merged?
It's always better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it !

User avatar
sunilssn
Learning the ropes
Learning the ropes
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 6:59 pm
Location: mumbai

Re: IOF .22 revolver

Post by sunilssn » Wed Mar 11, 2009 8:52 am

Hi,
Pl. DONT BUY IOF 0.22 revolver as it does not work with any ammo. Better raise the budget and buy 32 revolver

mhksmk
Learning the ropes
Learning the ropes
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 3:23 pm
Location: Mumbai

Re: IOF .22 revolver

Post by mhksmk » Thu Mar 12, 2009 2:12 am

The Indian carts for .32 are for Rs 65 each and the imported are for Rs 250 each, but the Imported carts for .22 is Rs 40 - 60 each. I think it is advisable to buy .22 than the .32.

User avatar
Olly
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1160
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 6:08 pm
Location: Earth - GPS 28.35N; 77.12E

Re: IOF .22 revolver

Post by Olly » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:31 am

Buy the ctgs from Delhi... they are much much cheaper....

tonytennis
Fresh on the boat
Fresh on the boat
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:18 pm
Location: Bhubaneswar

Re: IOF .22 revolver

Post by tonytennis » Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:36 pm

dont go for that IOF .22 Revolver the price if 40000 but see how it looks. finishing is soo bad looks realy ugly bette you go for .32 revolver.

User avatar
dev
Old Timer
Old Timer
Posts: 2614
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:16 pm
Location: New Delhi

Re: IOF .22 revolver

Post by dev » Fri Mar 13, 2009 5:18 pm

tonytennis wrote:dont go for that IOF .22 Revolver the price if 40000 but see how it looks. finishing is soo bad looks realy ugly bette you go for .32 revolver.
I wouldn't have minded the looks if the damn thing would function like it should. Course I haven't touched one yet but I have read reams of negatives about it. The 32 atleast works.

Dev
To ride, to speak up, to shoot straight.

Post Reply