Graphics in response to Mumbai attacks
-
- Learning the ropes
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 6:21 am
- Location: Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Graphics in response to Mumbai attacks
I could really use photos of the event or the destruction after it, if any are available that are not copyrighted by news services. For now, here's one poster:
Large file: http://olegvolk.net/gallery/technology/ ... ewsIndex=1
Large file: http://olegvolk.net/gallery/technology/ ... ewsIndex=1
Last edited by Oleg Volk on Mon Dec 01, 2008 7:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Old Timer
- Posts: 2973
- Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 7:28 pm
- Location: US
Oleg Valk
Thats great but do make a poster highlighting the bravery of the bystanders fighting with stones
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... India.html
Best
Thats great but do make a poster highlighting the bravery of the bystanders fighting with stones
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... India.html
Best
-
- Learning the ropes
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 6:21 am
- Location: Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Re: Graphics in response to Mumbai attacks
I will do that, thanks for the idea. In the meantime:
-
- Old Timer
- Posts: 2973
- Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 7:28 pm
- Location: US
-
- We post a lot
- Posts: 5775
- Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 6:23 pm
-
- Learning the ropes
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 6:21 am
- Location: Nashville, Tennessee, USA
-
- Shooting true
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 3:14 pm
- Location: Qatar
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 1427
- Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 10:15 am
- Location: Shillong-Dimapur
Re: Graphics in response to Mumbai attacks
Nice, really nice, Oleg.
It's taking shape. Maybe some graphics could be designed as a subtle prod at the brain-dead bureaucracy.
Why?- Well, the Indian Arms Act, while being severely restrictive, still allows for (or at least originally did) 'reasonably adequate' ownership. The problem is the provisions in the act allow too much latitude for interpretation by the bureaucracy and upto a good extent, the judiciary. I placed 'reasonably adequate', in quotes because its by no means ideal. One must remember that the Arms Act is just repainted version of the one that was in force in colonial India- like wise one can hardly expect it to be in tune with a free, democratic, modern nation.
Obviously, with regard to RKBA, one cannot expect 100% unregulated freedom in a country as big and diverse as India. Certainly some level of control and regulation is welcome and perhaps indispensable. The point to tackle is the unreasonable, illogical, unscientific and naive restrictions and interpretations that are afforded to the establishment by the provisions of the Arms Act.
As expected, a lot of things get interconnected- A less restrictive Arms Act will work only if there is a parallel advancement in Policing and related Crime Acts.... Our current Police Act is still mostly the Police Act of 1861- That was when the Police force was an instrument of arbitrary Colonial rule. Nobody in the establishment thought it fit for revision even after more than half a century of independence. Modifying or add-ons to the Act only complicates matters as I see. Well, to be fair, there has been efforts to formulate a new police act (with the standard establishment practice of constituting endless committees to that end) but they never went beyond the submission of the report. The political class has vested interest in seeing that the Policing remains as it is.
One must be aware, as penpusher rightly said, as of now, in India gun ownership is a privilege not a right.
It's taking shape. Maybe some graphics could be designed as a subtle prod at the brain-dead bureaucracy.
Why?- Well, the Indian Arms Act, while being severely restrictive, still allows for (or at least originally did) 'reasonably adequate' ownership. The problem is the provisions in the act allow too much latitude for interpretation by the bureaucracy and upto a good extent, the judiciary. I placed 'reasonably adequate', in quotes because its by no means ideal. One must remember that the Arms Act is just repainted version of the one that was in force in colonial India- like wise one can hardly expect it to be in tune with a free, democratic, modern nation.
Obviously, with regard to RKBA, one cannot expect 100% unregulated freedom in a country as big and diverse as India. Certainly some level of control and regulation is welcome and perhaps indispensable. The point to tackle is the unreasonable, illogical, unscientific and naive restrictions and interpretations that are afforded to the establishment by the provisions of the Arms Act.
As expected, a lot of things get interconnected- A less restrictive Arms Act will work only if there is a parallel advancement in Policing and related Crime Acts.... Our current Police Act is still mostly the Police Act of 1861- That was when the Police force was an instrument of arbitrary Colonial rule. Nobody in the establishment thought it fit for revision even after more than half a century of independence. Modifying or add-ons to the Act only complicates matters as I see. Well, to be fair, there has been efforts to formulate a new police act (with the standard establishment practice of constituting endless committees to that end) but they never went beyond the submission of the report. The political class has vested interest in seeing that the Policing remains as it is.
One must be aware, as penpusher rightly said, as of now, in India gun ownership is a privilege not a right.
He who can not think, is a fool; he who will not, a bigot; he who dare not - a slave!
- kanwar76
- Eminent IFG'an
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:00 pm
- Location: Bang-a-lure
- Contact:
Re: Graphics in response to Mumbai attacks
Thanks Oleg,
I think these can make perfect stickers for IFG (with IFG url) if Oleg permit to print them
I think these can make perfect stickers for IFG (with IFG url) if Oleg permit to print them
I am the Saint the Soldier that walks in Peace. I am the Humble dust of your feet, But dont think my Spirituality makes me weak. The Heavens will roar if my Kirpan were to speak...
-
- Fresh on the boat
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 2:02 pm
- Location: Bangalore
Re: Graphics in response to Mumbai attacks
These are great graphics, Oleg.
Very moving , particularly the "rocks" one.
Very moving , particularly the "rocks" one.
-
- Learning the ropes
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 6:21 am
- Location: Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- mundaire
- We post a lot
- Posts: 5410
- Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 5:53 pm
- Location: New Delhi, India
- Contact:
Oleg, very nice work indeed! Thank you for your support.
Would you be open to be contacted by someone from the Indian media? I ask as a journalist has sent me a request via e-mail. Also may I attach the above images to a post on my private blog (with due credit of course)?
Also, could you e-mail me the PSD files for these three graphics? My e-mail ID is abhijeet <at> abhijeetsingh <dot> com - I'd like to use some of them for a printed handout/ flyer.
Cheers!
Abhijeet
Would you be open to be contacted by someone from the Indian media? I ask as a journalist has sent me a request via e-mail. Also may I attach the above images to a post on my private blog (with due credit of course)?
Also, could you e-mail me the PSD files for these three graphics? My e-mail ID is abhijeet <at> abhijeetsingh <dot> com - I'd like to use some of them for a printed handout/ flyer.
Cheers!
Abhijeet
Like & share IndiansForGuns Facebook Page
Follow IndiansForGuns on Twitter
FIGHT FOR YOUR RIGHTS - JOIN NAGRI NOW!
www.gunowners.in
"Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire." -- Robert Heinlein
Follow IndiansForGuns on Twitter
FIGHT FOR YOUR RIGHTS - JOIN NAGRI NOW!
www.gunowners.in
"Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire." -- Robert Heinlein