Celebratory gunfire - a potential safety hazard!

Discussions related to firearms that do not fit in anywhere else.
penpusher

Re: Celebratory gunfire - a potential safety hazard!

Post by penpusher » Sat Apr 28, 2007 4:30 pm

If memory serves me right,a woman had died at Benazir Bhutto's wedding from clebratory gunfire as well.

Law does not specifically prohibit firing in public places.The terms of the license however prohibit a person from" taking a firearm to a fair,religious procession or other public assemblage".So you can take a firearm to a public place as long as it is not a public gathering and can also discharge a firearm,provided it is for a legitimate purpose.However, the licensing authority can also grant an exemption to a licensee from these restrictions. Now whether a wedding is a public assemblage within the meaning of these provisions or if firing in the air is something that is allowed,is something that only a lawyer can answer.

penpusher

For Advertising mail webmaster
Haroon
Fresh on the boat
Fresh on the boat
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 8:08 pm

Aerial Firing

Post by Haroon » Thu Aug 30, 2007 5:31 pm

Guys, is aerial firing safe....are fire crackers a better option during celebrations.....your feedback / opinion will be appreciated......cheers

Mack The Knife
We post a lot
We post a lot
Posts: 5775
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 6:23 pm

Re: Aerial Firing

Post by Mack The Knife » Thu Aug 30, 2007 5:43 pm

Guys, is aerial firing safe....
This practice gets a big thumbs down from me.

Mack The Knife

User avatar
dev
Old Timer
Old Timer
Posts: 2614
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:16 pm
Location: New Delhi

Post by dev » Thu Aug 30, 2007 6:10 pm

No aliens have been known to shoot back and their lasers are more destructive than our bullets.
Secondly, ever thought of what happens to your bullet after you let loose at the sky? Not everyone likes to walk around with an extra hole in the head humming," it's raining men." ;-)
So be a good guy and stop doing it.

Regards,

Dev
To ride, to speak up, to shoot straight.

User avatar
Vikram
We post a lot
We post a lot
Posts: 5107
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 6:14 am
Location: Tbilisi,Georgia

Post by Vikram » Thu Aug 30, 2007 6:41 pm

H Haroon, We had a big discussion on it earlier.It is not a safe practice seem to be the general consensus.

Best-
Vikram
It ain’t over ’til it’s over! "Rocky,Rocky,Rocky....."

User avatar
kanwar76
Eminent IFG'an
Eminent IFG'an
Posts: 1861
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: Bang-a-lure
Contact:

Re: Aerial Firing

Post by kanwar76 » Thu Aug 30, 2007 7:01 pm

Hi,

Are you Haroon Lala from Pakistan Hunting Community?

Please post an intro and welcome to the forum.

-Inder
I am the Saint the Soldier that walks in Peace. I am the Humble dust of your feet, But dont think my Spirituality makes me weak. The Heavens will roar if my Kirpan were to speak...

User avatar
Olly
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1160
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 6:08 pm
Location: Earth - GPS 28.35N; 77.12E

Post by Olly » Thu Aug 30, 2007 7:04 pm

It is definitely a NO. Dev is right... just put yourself on the receiving end of a falling piece of lead or shot... that too from a vey considerable height... i shudder to think of it... so why do it for anyone else to get hurt... TOTALLY UNSAFE AND OUTRAGEOUS...

Haroon
Fresh on the boat
Fresh on the boat
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 8:08 pm

Post by Haroon » Thu Aug 30, 2007 7:32 pm

hELLO gUYS,
tHANKS for the feedback....I have just joined your wonderful team...its gr8....Hi Inder ! thanks for the welcome.....I am not from Pak hunting community....Cheers

cottage cheese
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1427
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 10:15 am
Location: Shillong-Dimapur

Re: Aerial Firing

Post by cottage cheese » Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:45 pm

Read somewhere that during the celebration of the downfall of the Najubullah regime (Post-Soviet), scores of people were killed or maimed by a rain of celebratory bullets returning from the sky. I'm sure most of us saw AK's all over being fired off by the magazine loads into the air, many in pretty shallow trajectory.

All the advice given by folks here are valuable.

:)

User avatar
mundaire
We post a lot
We post a lot
Posts: 5410
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 5:53 pm
Location: New Delhi, India
Contact:

Post by mundaire » Thu Aug 30, 2007 11:31 pm

IIRC the previous discussion we had on this topic and the final consensus that came out of it -

1) What goes up must come down
2) Bullets usually come down bottom first
3) While the energy of falling bullets is no where close to their muzzle energy and is generally considered lower than what is required for a "clean kill" - it is still enough to cause serious injury/ damage to someone unfortunate enough to be at the receiving end!
4) A large number of serious injuries/ deaths caused by celebratory gunfire are due to the fact that guns are almost always let off at an angle and that means that anyone who is at even a slightly higher elevation than the shooter is at risk - think bridegrooms at weddings/ other revellers on balconies/ higher floors etc.

IN CONCLUSION AS MENTIONED IN THE POSTS ABOVE - THIS IS A HIGHLY UNSAFE PRACTICE!

Cheers!
Abhijeet

P.S. - For those in India, this practice is cause enough to have your arms license revoked PERMANENTLY... SO THINK AGAIN before doing it.
Like & share IndiansForGuns Facebook Page
Follow IndiansForGuns on Twitter

FIGHT FOR YOUR RIGHTS - JOIN NAGRI NOW!

www.gunowners.in

"Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire." -- Robert Heinlein

sa_ali
Shooting true
Shooting true
Posts: 945
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:50 pm

Post by sa_ali » Fri Aug 31, 2007 5:19 am

It is mentioned on the license book for license issued from delhi, that the license can be revoked for firing in air for any undue reason. :)
I personally know ppl resorted to firing in air after marriage and one of the jerks didnt notice what was above him, he fired a 12 bor and that brought down tent portion as that blew away the bamboo hold the tent, luckily no one died. So absolute no, if u have to, go to range and fire there.

Ali

User avatar
mundaire
We post a lot
We post a lot
Posts: 5410
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 5:53 pm
Location: New Delhi, India
Contact:

Post by mundaire » Fri Aug 31, 2007 11:08 am

Thread now merged with the older thread (on the same topic).

Cheers!
Abhijeet
Like & share IndiansForGuns Facebook Page
Follow IndiansForGuns on Twitter

FIGHT FOR YOUR RIGHTS - JOIN NAGRI NOW!

www.gunowners.in

"Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire." -- Robert Heinlein

penpusher

Re: Celebratory gunfire - a potential safety hazard!

Post by penpusher » Sat Sep 01, 2007 8:35 pm

I am sure that a rifle bullet falling back to earth would not have the velocity to kill anybody.Have never heard of anybody getting killed or even injured like that.For that you would need to up the caliber.We are talking about artillery here.A artillery shell would do the job but not a piddly rifle bullet

penpusher

cottage cheese
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1427
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 10:15 am
Location: Shillong-Dimapur

Re: Celebratory gunfire - a potential safety hazard!

Post by cottage cheese » Sat Sep 01, 2007 8:42 pm

penpusher";p="25863 wrote:I am sure that a rifle bullet falling back to earth would not have the velocity to kill anybody.Have never heard of anybody getting killed or even injured like that.For that you would need to up the caliber.We are talking about artillery here.A artillery shell would do the job but not a piddly rifle bullet

penpusher
Well its probably true, but I'm not going to be the one trying to prove the theory it right or wrong :mrgreen:
In fact nobody should!

Hi penpusher haven't seen you a while.

User avatar
mundaire
We post a lot
We post a lot
Posts: 5410
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 5:53 pm
Location: New Delhi, India
Contact:

Post by mundaire » Sun Sep 02, 2007 12:56 am

penpusher";p="25863 wrote: I am sure that a rifle bullet falling back to earth would not have the velocity to kill anybody.Have never heard of anybody getting killed or even injured like that.For that you would need to up the caliber.We are talking about artillery here.A artillery shell would do the job but not a piddly rifle bullet

penpusher
penpusher - since you've been around since the Yahoo group days, wonder if you read the link that I'd posted (on the Yahoo group) to the study conducted by the US military on this subject. IIRC the genesis of the study was to figure out if they could (potentially and effectively) fire machine guns in the air at an angle, with the view of raining bullets on the enemy - causing enough damage/ injury to the soldiers on the other side. The study used standard .30-06 ammo and concluded that while the falling bullets could indeed cause injury, their energy was not sufficient to cause debilitating injuries or death - except in rare/ freak cases. HOWEVER, the fact remains that there is INDEED the potential for needless injuries (whether debilitating or not) AND also the fact that most of the serious injuries are caused by bullets on their way up and not on their way down - simply because a large number of these incidents occur in populated areas with the person firing the gun on the street and (invariably) the person being injured (or worse) being at a higher elevation...

It is an unsafe practice no doubt and one which should be strongly discouraged!

Cheers!
Abhijeet

P.S. - As CC mentioned, haven't seen you online in a while...
Like & share IndiansForGuns Facebook Page
Follow IndiansForGuns on Twitter

FIGHT FOR YOUR RIGHTS - JOIN NAGRI NOW!

www.gunowners.in

"Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire." -- Robert Heinlein

Post Reply