I saw this on sale at Griffin and Howe interesting hopefully IA could atleast copy this way of making sniper rifles ..what are your thoughts India should have a large stock of LA1 in same caliber. Note how stock was modified with cheek plates etc ..Its kind of pricey though at $5600 ish
http://www.griffinhowe.com/riflemoreinfo.cfm
Look under used rifles section
"
Comments : Lee Enfield L42A1: A beautiful example of the United Kingdom's primary sniper rifle from the early 1970s through the first Gulf War. Fewer than 600 of these rare rifles were imported to the United States. This rifle started it's life as an Enfield MK 4 rifle in World War II at the Birmingham Small Arms factory, in .303 British caliber. It was converted into a sniper rifle at that time (and thus marked with a "T" for "telescope"). After it's World War II service, it was eventually re-converted by the British Army into a 7.62 NATO (.308) caliber sniper rifle, redesignated the L42A1, in 1971. This rifle is all original and all matching : rifle, scope, mount, and stock all match. Bore is pristine. The scope has also been properly recalibrated for the 7.62 round and is in perfect working order, having been recently refurbished. "
Lee Enfield - L42 A1 - 7.62 Nato caliber
-
- Old Timer
- Posts: 2973
- Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 7:28 pm
- Location: US
Lee Enfield - L42 A1 - 7.62 Nato caliber
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- timmy
- Old Timer
- Posts: 3027
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:03 am
- Location: home on the range
Re: Lee Enfield - L42 A1 - 7.62 Nato caliber
Navi, these things are very cool, IMO. I am guessing that they have full-floated the barrel. Bedding to the action and barrel was always the problem with the SMLE - Mk 4 design, and floating the barrel would help in this regard.
Still, there is the area where the fore end beds against the buttstock socket and the area where it beds against the action around the trigger to worry about. I notice that between the buttstock socket and the fore end, there appears to be a thin layer of material (last and second to the last pictures). That would indicate that the armory was trying to address these issues.
It would be interesting to know how well these things shoot, and what they expected of them. Also, how they performed in the field after being knocked about in real service. This would give a true indication of how a sporting rifle could be expected to perform.
A very interesting rifle, and one I would love to own! For a sniper, having that magazine capacity and the quickness of operation would be great, I think! I would love to own one, but such a rifle is beyond what I could justify spending.
Lovely!
Still, there is the area where the fore end beds against the buttstock socket and the area where it beds against the action around the trigger to worry about. I notice that between the buttstock socket and the fore end, there appears to be a thin layer of material (last and second to the last pictures). That would indicate that the armory was trying to address these issues.
It would be interesting to know how well these things shoot, and what they expected of them. Also, how they performed in the field after being knocked about in real service. This would give a true indication of how a sporting rifle could be expected to perform.
A very interesting rifle, and one I would love to own! For a sniper, having that magazine capacity and the quickness of operation would be great, I think! I would love to own one, but such a rifle is beyond what I could justify spending.
Lovely!
“Fanaticism consists of redoubling your efforts when you have forgotten your aim.”
saying in the British Royal Navy
saying in the British Royal Navy
-
- Shooting true
- Posts: 945
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:50 pm
Re: Lee Enfield - L42 A1 - 7.62 Nato caliber
Our govt considers it as junk, what an irony, thats what happens when ppl have no clue on what they are doing.
-
- Old Timer
- Posts: 2973
- Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 7:28 pm
- Location: US
Re: Lee Enfield - L42 A1 - 7.62 Nato caliber
timmy I agree its expensive and sa_ali its the govt but importantly the folks at ordnance factory and their workmanship thats questionable because of absolute monopoly in the market.