.. This SnapShot (Incidences of IPC crime during 2010) is taken from the website of the 'Nation Crime Record Bureau' ..
Showing Delhi; rather I must add more that three-fourth of India is in a critical state of Voilent crimes (IPC) ..
.. and our authorities says 'there is no grave/significant threat to the life of applicant' when someone applies for Weapon License .. thereby resulting the rejection of the application of the applicant .. preventing a man to fight against the bad ..
Its sad ..
Expand the pic to see the truth .. and this is not even 1 % because these figures denotes incidences/crimes which are reported and only of IPC and not CrPC .. however we all know that how many crime gets reported w.r.t. number of crimes which actually happens ..
We drive cars .. some people drive carefully .. some drives it rash, but we give license to every Tom, Dick and Harry who applies for it .. Now these frats (not necessarily Brats) take a two tonnes weapon and start mowing down the road and people also .. but we still give licenses to invite new frats .. day-by-day, year-by-year ..
AND on the other hand .. if a person goes for applying for a gun license then they ask Family Details .. Work Details .. psychopathic analysis .. requirement/need .. medical report .. Financial Report .. Class .. capacity .. blah blah blah ..
This is hypocrisy .. legal age for driving/voting/apparently for every thing is 18 (or 21) years but (it is a big BUT though) what do you think - if a major/adult (bearing 18 or 21 years of age) goes and apply for weapon license!! to this I hope; we all know the answer ..
If this is it and concern for civilian lives are a real bothering issue for the Law-makers then they should ask same set of questions while one applies for a Driving License .. Family Details .. Work Details .. psychopathic analysis .. requirement/need .. medical report .. Financial Report .. Class .. capacity .. blah blah blah .. and then if suitability is acheived then only grant the license ..
Well .. nothing much to say ..
Authorities should realise that the use (or misuse) of resources are very much case subjective and they should not impose a general restriction on these (such grave) vital resources .. after all it's my life and I have got the right to save it; by any means whatsoever ..
They should realise that a crime (often deadly) is committed through various weapons and means; even by police personnels and Jawan(s) of para military forces and military (we have read/seen/heard several such cases of shooting in distress), but seldome it is committed from a licensed weapon .. it is for self defence and is only shall be used for such causes ..
They should see us and recognise us individually and not like herd' ..
I wish ..
Untill then ..
Cheerio ..
Vishal
Guns don't Kill people - POLICIES DO
... and 'They' say .. 'there is no significant threat'
-
χάος
- Learning the ropes
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 5:20 am
- Location: New Delhi
... and 'They' say .. 'there is no significant threat'
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Adios'
V
Guns don't kill people - POLICIES DO
What we call chaos is just patterns we haven't recognized. What we call random is just patterns we can't decipher. what we can't understand we call nonsense. What we can't read we call gibberish.
V
Guns don't kill people - POLICIES DO
What we call chaos is just patterns we haven't recognized. What we call random is just patterns we can't decipher. what we can't understand we call nonsense. What we can't read we call gibberish.
-
xl_target
- Old Timer
- Posts: 3488
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 7:47 am
- Location: USA
Re: ... and 'They' say .. 'there is no significant threat'
Agree with you.
You're preaching to the choir, buddy.
You're preaching to the choir, buddy.
“Never give in, never give in, never; never; never; never – in nothing, great or small, large or petty – never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense” — Winston Churchill, Oct 29, 1941