For what it is worth..

Posts that don't fit into any other category. If it's anything to do with guns, it probably doesn't belong here!
Post Reply
MoA
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1644
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 8:08 pm

For what it is worth..

Post by MoA » Tue Jul 26, 2011 11:48 pm

Blog Has absolutely nothing to do with guns.

For Advertising mail webmaster
Subal das
Shooting true
Shooting true
Posts: 809
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 7:48 am
Location: Hyderabad
Contact:

Re: For what it is worth..

Post by Subal das » Tue Jul 26, 2011 11:58 pm

Why your computer is slow and the Network congested

We just have to design our systems with 63 bit architecture rather than 64 bit architecture. That way we will underuse the available capacity, and will have outsmarted the ravages of electricity.
wow!! thanks for sharing. def that is one of the most stupidest thing I ever read about computers
"Loose lips sink ships"
"Curiosity kill the cat"

MoA
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1644
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 8:08 pm

Re: For what it is worth..

Post by MoA » Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:00 am

Subal das wrote:
Why your computer is slow and the Network congested

We just have to design our systems with 63 bit architecture rather than 64 bit architecture. That way we will underuse the available capacity, and will have outsmarted the ravages of electricity.
wow!! thanks for sharing. def that is one of the most stupidest thing I ever read about computers
You do know what humor is? :roll:

User avatar
hamiclar01
Shooting true
Shooting true
Posts: 964
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 4:46 am
Location: delhi
Contact:

Re: For what it is worth..

Post by hamiclar01 » Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:27 am

MoA wrote: You do know what humor is? :roll:
:mrgreen: .

BTW, congrats. Look forwards to reading more
"Stan, don't you know the first law of physics? Anything that's fun costs at least eight dollars."

User avatar
timmy
Old Timer
Old Timer
Posts: 3030
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:03 am
Location: home on the range

Re: For what it is worth..

Post by timmy » Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:59 am

The computer piece is an interesting theory, but I fear that the blogger is all wrong. We old telecom guys, who have been familiar with digital transmission long before these ethernet whiz kids were a gleam in someone's eye know that the problem has nothing to do with data boulders at all, or the hypothesis of congestion caused by collisions with such boulders.

The neophyte blogger must actually start at the root of the problem, which is fundamentally philosophical, by realizing that all of us are simply flotsam and jetsam, cast aside on the banks of the bit stream of life.

Once he realizes this, understanding and correcting the problem becomes simple!

First, notice how the author confuses electricity and electrons with bits. Using these terms interchangeably is an obvious clue to the incorrect nature of his explanation (besides not facing philosophical reality about life itself).

The problem lies with some of his bits, which he seems to acknowledge toward the end of his essay. But it is not that these bits are clogging up his system: The problem is that these bits are missing.

I don't wish to sound condescending, but frankly, I can see that this fellow is a total newbie in the field of digital electronics, because he has yet to mention one of the most critical of all components of any system running on digital formats, and that is the bit bucket. Naturally, this results in requests for retransmission and the resultant loss in processing power and bandwidth. If the problem is severe, bits from the retransmission requests can also be regularly lost, compounding the problem even further.

The author would find, if he would simply place bit buckets under the sharp bends of his wiring and by his wireless antennas, that bits are escaping at an alarming rate. This can be seen by how quickly his bit buckets are filling.

By periodically returning the contents of his bit buckets into the system (an ordinary plastic funnel can facilitate returning the errant bits into a handy USB or ethernet port), he will find his systems and networks running much happier.
“Fanaticism consists of redoubling your efforts when you have forgotten your aim.”

saying in the British Royal Navy

Subal das
Shooting true
Shooting true
Posts: 809
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 7:48 am
Location: Hyderabad
Contact:

Re: For what it is worth..

Post by Subal das » Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:23 am

MoA wrote:
Subal das wrote:
Why your computer is slow and the Network congested

We just have to design our systems with 63 bit architecture rather than 64 bit architecture. That way we will underuse the available capacity, and will have outsmarted the ravages of electricity.
wow!! thanks for sharing. def that is one of the most stupidest thing I ever read about computers
You do know what humor is? :roll:
just messing bro :mrgreen:
"Loose lips sink ships"
"Curiosity kill the cat"

dr.jayakumar
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1906
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:55 am
Location: tamilnadu,india

Re: For what it is worth..

Post by dr.jayakumar » Wed Jul 27, 2011 10:10 am

ooohh,
so many things to learn .(you are....it)
thanks

Post Reply