Hi, Lawman,
Mr.justice M. Katju, in his judgement has observed :- "The right to carry non-prohibited firearms is a part of
Article 21, of the Constitution, to hold otherwise would amount to keeping good and peace loving citizens defenceless while the criminals are well armed. This will be wholly arbitary and unreasonable. In these days when the law and order has broken down it is only an armed man who can lead a life of dignity and self respect.
no criminal or gangster can dare to assault or threaten such a person for fear of retaliation. Since the word 'LIFE' in
Article 21 - right to life and liberty- of the Constitution has been held by the Supreme Court to mean a life of dignity, the right to carry non-prohibited firearms must be deemed to be included in Article-21."
The Hon'able Judge further observed :- "Normally it is the duty of the state to protect the Citizens. However, when the state authorities are not properly discharging their function, What is to be done ? In such a situation, the only reasonable view can be that the citizens must defend themselves, and they can effectively do so only if they are armed. The situation in the country today is that law and order has deteriorated to a very great extend. Mafia type gangs have established a reign of terror in many cities and violence, kidnapping and extortion are rampant. Since parts of the country are terrorist-invested, and even in other parts, hoodlums with country made weapons are on the rampage. Peaceful and law abiding citizens are often afraid to stir out of thier houses after dark or go out to certain places. "
hope now you are
Hock ann,