Moreover, the State through it's Parliament has
officially acknowledged that it is not always possible or sufficient to provide security by government in the Section 2(f) of Private Security Agencies (Regulation) Act, 2005. That is why it says the following -
"private security" means security provided by a person, other than a public servant, to protect or guard any person or property or both and includes provision of armoured car service;
Section 2(f) is saying the above because the "private security" also includes the inherent right to private security provided by person to himself, his family and society. The right of "private defense" as mentioned from Sections 96 to 106 IPC is also a part of the right of "private security".
Similarly, the Section 2(g) of Private Security Agencies (Regulation) Act, 2005 tells what is a private security agency. it says the following -
"private security agency" means a person or body of persons other than a government agency, department or organisation engaged in the business of providing private security services including training to private security guards or their supervisor or providing private security guards to any industrial or business undertaking or a company or any other person or property;
Section 2(g) is saying the above because the private security agency includes the inherent right to free agency in every person to provide private security to himself, his family and society.
Similarly the Section 2(h) of Private Security Agencies (Regulation) Act, 2005 tells what is a private security guard. It says the following -
"private security guard" means a person providing private security with or without arms to another person or property or both and includes a supervisor;
Section 2(h) is saying the above because every person has inherent right be an
armed private security guard to himself, his family and society.