''Arms Licence-Inventing Objections''
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 12:13 pm
It seems that all administrators are doing is inventing objections for choking applications of arms licence on verbal instructions of higher authorities.
An ADM in Himachal is refering back many applications to SP in which he has completed the process of verification. Many cases are sent back with a question :
''Whether issue of arms licence in the name of applicant is bad for the situation of law and order in our district?''
The objection is investigated in such a way as if applicant has comitted a crime in applying for an arms licence and ADM has specific knowledge About it. This question is asked after the ADM has received positive verification from the SP for issue of licence.
The completion of verification by police must be completed within 45 days as per Govt rule but this pendency is created after the verification process has been completed. So time rule does not apply on this choke diversion.
This diversion is followed in cases which have no connection with ruling party/ netaji/ judge sahab/ boss/ staff obligation/ or other filters which LA seems fit for the game.
It looks like applying for an arms licence automatically means fighting a case in the court.
Indian IAS clearly working like colonial british officers to deny common people protection of arms.
Creating new diversions to keep documents pending saves LA from litigations till he receives orders for transfer. What an idea sirji.
Is there a fixed time period within which the LA must clear or reject applications for issue of arms licence?
Does keeping pending beyond reasonable time by LA automatically means denial?
Please give court judgement/ notification / rule/ section which can help
An ADM in Himachal is refering back many applications to SP in which he has completed the process of verification. Many cases are sent back with a question :
''Whether issue of arms licence in the name of applicant is bad for the situation of law and order in our district?''
The objection is investigated in such a way as if applicant has comitted a crime in applying for an arms licence and ADM has specific knowledge About it. This question is asked after the ADM has received positive verification from the SP for issue of licence.
The completion of verification by police must be completed within 45 days as per Govt rule but this pendency is created after the verification process has been completed. So time rule does not apply on this choke diversion.
This diversion is followed in cases which have no connection with ruling party/ netaji/ judge sahab/ boss/ staff obligation/ or other filters which LA seems fit for the game.
It looks like applying for an arms licence automatically means fighting a case in the court.
Indian IAS clearly working like colonial british officers to deny common people protection of arms.
Creating new diversions to keep documents pending saves LA from litigations till he receives orders for transfer. What an idea sirji.
Is there a fixed time period within which the LA must clear or reject applications for issue of arms licence?
Does keeping pending beyond reasonable time by LA automatically means denial?
Please give court judgement/ notification / rule/ section which can help