Deletion of section 13 (2-A) of d Arms Act 1959
- beinganilkumar
- Fresh on the boat
- Posts: 0
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:33 am
- Location: Himachal Pradesh ,INDIA
- Contact:
Deletion of section 13 (2-A) of d Arms Act 1959
On 15th July cabinet approves deletion of section 13 (2-A) of d Arms Act 1959. Now, no arms licence can be granted without police verification report & its mandatory for police to submit report to the licensing authority within 60 days failing which police official concerned is liable for action .
-
- Old Timer
- Posts: 2928
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: Deletion of section 13 (2-A) of d Arms Act 1959
This is nothing but slow and steady creeping disarmament of law abiding people over the years.
Please details of this topic refer: http://indiansforguns.com/viewtopic.php ... 72&start=0
and http://indiansforguns.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=10373
Above means absolutely nothing in legal language. What kind of action? Will he be dismissed? Will his promotion be affected? Or just a verbal rebuke? Or just a wink?police official concerned is liable for action
Please details of this topic refer: http://indiansforguns.com/viewtopic.php ... 72&start=0
and http://indiansforguns.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=10373
"If my mother tongue is shaking the foundations of your State, it probably means that you built your State on my land" - Musa Anter, Kurdish writer, assassinated by the Turkish secret services in 1992
- snIPer
- Veteran
- Posts: 1664
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 12:06 pm
Re: Deletion of section 13 (2-A) of d Arms Act 1959
Also if I am not mistaken, police verification is still a must but there is no time limit specified for it.
/S/
/S/
On my Epitaph - Off to Happy Hunting Grounds.
-
- Shooting true
- Posts: 633
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:29 am
- Location: Hyderabad
Re: Deletion of section 13 (2-A) of d Arms Act 1959
Pardon my ignorance, but why is this being specifically mentioned?
Does this mean that the Cabinet Did Not approve the rest of the proposed amendments/policy changes or is it just a statement of facts? A little elaboration for people like me
...
Anand
Does this mean that the Cabinet Did Not approve the rest of the proposed amendments/policy changes or is it just a statement of facts? A little elaboration for people like me
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f81d/1f81d07732de741f27b73bd00570af988f73ccea" alt="Confused :?"
Anand
-
- Old Timer
- Posts: 2928
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: Deletion of section 13 (2-A) of d Arms Act 1959
As per my understanding, the MHA did not go ahead with complete set of amendments to Arms Act as desired by it originally, because of objections sent by all of us by January 6, 2010(In a way we were successful in stopping the draconian amendments). Hence complete set of amendments as originally proposed by MHA never went to cabinet. Instead MHA has found alternative way to do the same thing by the way of giving a notification instead of amendments(Since Arms Act gives practically unlimited powers to executive(Arms Act is suffering from vice of over delegation of powers) ).
For the deletion of Section 13(2A) it is taking the help of an ongoing case in Supreme Court to push its hidden agenda. Only this part has been referred to cabinet. Please refer following for details of the case: http://indiansforguns.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=9037 and http://indiansforguns.com/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=8109
For the deletion of Section 13(2A) it is taking the help of an ongoing case in Supreme Court to push its hidden agenda. Only this part has been referred to cabinet. Please refer following for details of the case: http://indiansforguns.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=9037 and http://indiansforguns.com/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=8109
"If my mother tongue is shaking the foundations of your State, it probably means that you built your State on my land" - Musa Anter, Kurdish writer, assassinated by the Turkish secret services in 1992