Gentlemen, I thank you for your kind responses.
There were many considerations, I had to make sure that I did not cause an "alarming" situation
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/837d9/837d987497f8b1c9b27a3976d67097777d5f4630" alt="Shocked :shock:"
. I had to reassure them that I was in fact carrying legitimately, I did not want to think that I was threatening them in any way. But I was also not going to keep quite while my rights(privileges??
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46533/46533dcf96fded7044cbeb48329ae3fcce3b5c88" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll:"
) were being violated. But I did not want to give any negative impressions of Arms licensees either.
But this whole "security" situation is really a serious one, because even if there were metal detectors or any number of "under car checking mirrors" at the Taj, Mumbai , I don't think they would have helped in preventing 26/11. So what exactly are all these so called "security measures" for? As some of the members mentioned an explosive need not necessarily be hidden only under the car or in the boot (where the checking usually occurs).
Also I don't believe Kasab or his friends would have, taken the time to pull out their "licenses and explain the situation" to the security people!
In my opinion, all These are merely "soft " measures to make it appear that something is being done and actually may give a false sense of security!
It may sound unusual, but I am more calm and it is harder for me to lose my composure or temper when I am carrying.
Regards,
Anand