Piston seals Vs Lubing.
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:21 pm
We all know that air rifles need tuning to improve performance. For those of us who have tuned our guns or have had our guns tuned, we know the difference. For some, just high velocity with smooth firing means performance while for others maximum velocity coupled with high accuracy and smoothness. While still for others, average velocity, but smoothness with accuracy and are happy with a max distance of 15 meters. The common denominator is “smoothness”.
We know that one of the major areas of tuning is the power plant. Friction plays a major factor (among others).
Theoretically, almost all spring have an average of 30% friction inside the power plant. One of the reasons for tuning is to reduce this friction as much as possible. Primary friction area is the piston washer and the chambers inner wall. Friction can be significantly reduced by lubing the internal parts mentioned, thought it is not that easy to lube inside so often. Also excess lubing might have side effects.
Now keeping lubing in mind, the question is, does lubing lie in the relationship between the seal and the type of inner wall? Does this depend on the type of washer / seal opted for?
For a “mirror smooth” inner wall, wouldn’t leather seals suit best?
My take is, the lather seal surface will always be rough, hence when the rifle is being cocked, lube stuck to the leather will lube the chambers inner wall acting like a lube brush. Therefore every time you fire your gun, you can be assured of proper lubrication.
On the other hand, if it is the synthetic seal, wouldn’t is wipe clean a smooth wall and deposit the lube in the front end? More like your shaving razor. And every time you shoot, wouldn’t it become more and more “dry”?
If a syntactic seal were to be used, wouldn’t a mild “matt finish” (matt enough to allow lube deposits but not act like a file) wall texture work wonders for a syntactic seal in that the seal cannot make a ‘clean sweep’ of the lube?
Gentlemen, your views please.
Gentle giant (PKJ), your’s in particular .
We know that one of the major areas of tuning is the power plant. Friction plays a major factor (among others).
Theoretically, almost all spring have an average of 30% friction inside the power plant. One of the reasons for tuning is to reduce this friction as much as possible. Primary friction area is the piston washer and the chambers inner wall. Friction can be significantly reduced by lubing the internal parts mentioned, thought it is not that easy to lube inside so often. Also excess lubing might have side effects.
Now keeping lubing in mind, the question is, does lubing lie in the relationship between the seal and the type of inner wall? Does this depend on the type of washer / seal opted for?
For a “mirror smooth” inner wall, wouldn’t leather seals suit best?
My take is, the lather seal surface will always be rough, hence when the rifle is being cocked, lube stuck to the leather will lube the chambers inner wall acting like a lube brush. Therefore every time you fire your gun, you can be assured of proper lubrication.
On the other hand, if it is the synthetic seal, wouldn’t is wipe clean a smooth wall and deposit the lube in the front end? More like your shaving razor. And every time you shoot, wouldn’t it become more and more “dry”?
If a syntactic seal were to be used, wouldn’t a mild “matt finish” (matt enough to allow lube deposits but not act like a file) wall texture work wonders for a syntactic seal in that the seal cannot make a ‘clean sweep’ of the lube?
Gentlemen, your views please.
Gentle giant (PKJ), your’s in particular .