Basu wrote:Dear Master,
ARs are really full of mysteries.
SDB Sport has a swept volume of 39 CC and it has capacity to deliver 12+Fpe or 16+ jules in .22.
SDB Artemis has a swept volume of 45 cc and it has capacity to deliver 14+Fpe or 19 jules in .22.
So I turn out to be a confused person between your logic and my data.
All above data are out of the box energy.
Basu
Dear Basu Da, Sam47 and Master,
I was going through this rather old yet VERY interesting thread.
I find that Basu da's MV figures pertaining to Sport and Artemis (in .22) are actually only reconfirming and validating what Master tried to articulate when he quoted the thread from Gateway to Airguns in one of his preceding posts. Both the out-of-the-box energy figures cited by Basu da are just 01 fpe below what the suggested (Rsterne on GTA) 1/3*swept volume fpe calculation!! With some smart tuning that you all have been trying out, this 01 fpe increase looks very much achievable.
Further, Sam47, with his long personal experience with the Artemis .177, has cited the fpe figures he gets from his tuned gun.....and it only vets Basu da's opinion that it s only fair to expect at 01-or-so Fpe difference between .177 and .22 cals of the same model ARs. In fact, you will kindly agree (as I have also verified with some seasoned AR experts): in similar models, a .22 version tends to claim roughly a 20% augmentation in MV over its .177 counterpart (all other specs being same). Given the design limitations with our Indian ARs, I would assume that for us, while the increase in .22 cal (over its .177 counterpart model) may not be to the tune of 20%, they certainly can achieve a 5-7% increase (i.e. roughly 01 Fpe).
I am citing these arguments and trying to revive this highly deliberative thread more to seek you all once again into a focused discussion. I hope this kindles you all and other members into sharing their thoughts on the subject. Will look forward and with warm regards to all,
Prashant
Added in 1 hour 27 minutes 19 seconds:
Master wrote:Basuda,
Based on your information only I tried g smith spring. It fits reasonably tightly, but not very tightly. I think it may vary a little from spring to spring. In my case, one end feels more tighter than the other.
Sam 47,
Precihole claims its AR to have 16 J energy. On Precihole Scorpius, which was 0.22, I used to get around 15 Joules. But on Pegasus 0.177 in stock condition, maximum I got was 9.82 ft. lb. (13.31 J) with 7.6 gr G Smith Amateur pellets. With G Smith 27 spring, the AR seems to be reaching its advertised power, though I will have to wait and see if this velocity sustains after 1000 shots. But this proves that it is possible to get this power in Precihole 0.177 if one can find right spring. Somebody can try suitable Titan XS spring and tell us the results.
For measuring the FPS correctly, I have dedicated my fortune in purchasing Cadwell precision ballistic chronograph. I have avoided detonation as far as possible by applying very thin coating of PH supermoly on piston, spring and seal only.
Dear Master,
Greetings!
Close to almost a year after this post of yours, I am wondering if you have been able to ascertain if the power and performance in your PH with G Smith 27 spring has sustained please!!
Also, if you would want me to try the Titan XS spring (what you suggested in your post), please let me know where to procure this spring from and I will go ahead and try it out and let you know the basic details (I do not have a crony like many of you

).
Warm regards,
Prashant