RKBA and the recent attempt to perpetrate terror in NYC, USA
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 10:36 am
IFG Brothers and Sisters:
I'd like to sound off about the attitude that seems to pervade out democracies. The man caught in connection with the recent bombing attempt is a US citizen, who happens to be a naturalized citizen -- he was formerly a citizen of Pakistan. Now let me say, I don't much care whether a person is blue or green, or from the moon. Our constitution is clear: there's only one "grade" or "level" of US citizenship.
Some of our right wing politicians are now calling for people like this accused American citizen to be treated under law as a terrorist, and not accorded the rights of an American citizen, which he is. One of these politicians is a decorated war hero and a recent presidential candidate, and I think his present position is a shame for a man who fought for his nation to hold.
However, now our politicians on the left, including the present Mayor of New York City, are calling for "suspected terrorists," like the accused American (he was on the "no fly" list) to be denied Second Amendment rights (RKBA), not because a crime has been committed, but because of suspicion of ill intent.
You see where this is going: one side of the political spectrum finds it convenient to race-bait and advocate treating immigrant new citizens as second class (similar to the lamentable and shameful period in American History when we locked up over 100,000 American citizens because they happened to be of Japanese descent 70 years ago). They are trying to take advantage of the present fears of terrorism to implement a racist policy.
On the other hand, the other side of the political spectrum is using the present fears of terrorism to try and deny Bill of Rights Constitutional guarantees of personal rights to further their pet anti gun political schemes.
May I suggest, it is a dangerous thing to give one's heart to a political movement without being vigilant regarding ALL of our rights. It is not acceptable to consent to giving up some of our rights, anymore than it is acceptable for a thief to rob us of only half of our wallet's contents.
Personally, I find this use of an event for other political ends to be disgusting and reprehensible.
With true regards in Firearms fellowship,
tim
I'd like to sound off about the attitude that seems to pervade out democracies. The man caught in connection with the recent bombing attempt is a US citizen, who happens to be a naturalized citizen -- he was formerly a citizen of Pakistan. Now let me say, I don't much care whether a person is blue or green, or from the moon. Our constitution is clear: there's only one "grade" or "level" of US citizenship.
Some of our right wing politicians are now calling for people like this accused American citizen to be treated under law as a terrorist, and not accorded the rights of an American citizen, which he is. One of these politicians is a decorated war hero and a recent presidential candidate, and I think his present position is a shame for a man who fought for his nation to hold.
However, now our politicians on the left, including the present Mayor of New York City, are calling for "suspected terrorists," like the accused American (he was on the "no fly" list) to be denied Second Amendment rights (RKBA), not because a crime has been committed, but because of suspicion of ill intent.
You see where this is going: one side of the political spectrum finds it convenient to race-bait and advocate treating immigrant new citizens as second class (similar to the lamentable and shameful period in American History when we locked up over 100,000 American citizens because they happened to be of Japanese descent 70 years ago). They are trying to take advantage of the present fears of terrorism to implement a racist policy.
On the other hand, the other side of the political spectrum is using the present fears of terrorism to try and deny Bill of Rights Constitutional guarantees of personal rights to further their pet anti gun political schemes.
May I suggest, it is a dangerous thing to give one's heart to a political movement without being vigilant regarding ALL of our rights. It is not acceptable to consent to giving up some of our rights, anymore than it is acceptable for a thief to rob us of only half of our wallet's contents.
Personally, I find this use of an event for other political ends to be disgusting and reprehensible.
With true regards in Firearms fellowship,
tim