After Westgate, Interpol Chief Ponders 'Armed Citizenry'

Discussions on the Right to Keep and Bear Arms.
Post Reply
spin_drift
Almost at nirvana
Almost at nirvana
Posts: 242
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 4:25 pm
Location: Noida

After Westgate, Interpol Chief Ponders 'Armed Citizenry'

Post by spin_drift » Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:25 pm

Exclusive: After Westgate, Interpol Chief Ponders 'Armed Citizenry'

Interpol Secretary General Ronald Noble said today the U.S. and the rest of the democratic world is at a security crossroads in the wake of last month's deadly al-Shabab attack at a shopping mall in Nairobi, Kenya – and suggested an answer could be in arming civilians.

In an exclusive interview with ABC News, Noble said there are really only two choices for protecting open societies from attacks like the one on Westgate mall where so-called "soft targets" are hit: either create secure perimeters around the locations or allow civilians to carry their own guns to protect themselves.

"Societies have to think about how they're going to approach the problem," Noble said. "One is to say we want an armed citizenry; you can see the reason for that. Another is to say the enclaves are so secure that in order to get into the soft target you're going to have to pass through extraordinary security."

Noble's comments came only moments after the official opening of the 82nd annual gathering of the Interpol's governing body, the General Assembly. The session is being held in Cartagena, Colombia, and is being used to highlight strides over the last decade in Colombia's battle against the notorious drug cartels that used to be the real power in the country.

The secretary general, an American who previously headed up all law enforcement for the U.S. Treasury Department, told reporters during a brief news conference that the Westgate mall attack marks what has long been seen as "an evolution in terrorism." Instead of targets like the Pentagon and World Trade Center that now have far more security since 9/11, attackers are focusing on sites with little security that attract large numbers of people.

At least 67 were killed over a period of days at the Westgate mall, more than 60 of the dead were civilians. The Somalia-based al Qaeda-allied terror group al-Shabab claimed responsibility for the attack as it was ongoing but investigators are still trying to determine exactly who planned the strike, where they are and what is next for them. U.S. authorities in Uganda, fearing another similar incident in Africa, issued a warning late last week.

Citing a recent call for al Qaeda "brothers to strike soft targets, to do it in small groups," Noble said law enforcement is now facing a daunting task.

"How do you protect soft targets? That's really the challenge. You can't have armed police forces everywhere," he told reporters. "It's Interpol's view that one way you protect soft targets is you make it more difficult for terrorist to move internationally. So what we're trying to do is to establish a way for countries … to screen passports, which are a terrorist's best friend, try to limit terrorists moving from country to country. And also, that we're able to share more info about suspected terrorists."

In the interview with ABC News, Noble was more blunt and directed his comments to his home country.

"Ask yourself: If that was Denver, Col., if that was Texas, would those guys have been able to spend hours, days, shooting people randomly?" Noble said, referring to states with pro-gun traditions. "What I'm saying is it makes police around the world question their views on gun control. It makes citizens question their views on gun control. You have to ask yourself, 'Is an armed citizenry more necessary now than it was in the past with an evolving threat of terrorism?' This is something that has to be discussed."

"For me it's a profound question," he continued. "People are quick to say 'gun control, people shouldn't be armed,' etc., etc. I think they have to ask themselves: 'Where would you have wanted to be? In a city where there was gun control and no citizens armed if you're in a Westgate mall, or in a place like Denver or Texas?'"

Prior to the Westgate attack, the gun control debate has been ignited time and time again in the U.S. in the aftermath of a series of mass shootings, including one in a movie theater in Aurora, Col., a suburb of Denver.

Source http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/exclusive ... d=20637341
I believe in second chances… it’s called reloading

For Advertising mail webmaster
User avatar
essdee1972
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1195
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 5:54 pm
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra

Re: After Westgate, Interpol Chief Ponders 'Armed Citizenry'

Post by essdee1972 » Wed Oct 23, 2013 2:16 pm

This guy deserves a .....:clap: !

Creating perimeters is not a solution. Passport and emigration check can stop (oh yeah?) maybe foreign terrorists. What about the home grown variety? You create perimeters around airports and Pentagon, the terrorists switch to shopping malls. You protect malls, they hit schools. And so on.

As the Secretary General of Interpol, Mr. Noble is rightly placed to publicise his views and persuade his colleagues. Hope he succeeds, even a tiny bit!!
Cheers!

EssDee
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
In a polity, each citizen is to possess his own arms, which are not supplied or owned by the state.Aristotle

Get up, stand up, Stand up for your rights. Get up, stand up, Don't give up the fight.Bob Marley

User avatar
nagarifle
Old Timer
Old Timer
Posts: 3404
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 1:43 pm
Location: The Land of the Nagas

Re: After Westgate, Interpol Chief Ponders 'Armed Citizenry'

Post by nagarifle » Wed Oct 23, 2013 5:45 pm

right,

good thing is the guy has given the options 1/ armed citizen 2/ super security where your fart could be mistaken for gas attack.
Nagarifle

if you say it can not be done, then you are right, for you, it can not be done.

User avatar
xl_target
Old Timer
Old Timer
Posts: 3488
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 7:47 am
Location: USA

Re: After Westgate, Interpol Chief Ponders 'Armed Citizenry'

Post by xl_target » Wed Oct 23, 2013 7:43 pm

nagarifle wrote:right,

good thing is the guy has given the options 1/ armed citizen 2/ super security where your fart could be mistaken for gas attack.
If that were the case, then people would be more careful about farting in public, wouldn't they? :)
An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life.
-Robert A. Heinlein
“Never give in, never give in, never; never; never; never – in nothing, great or small, large or petty – never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense” — Winston Churchill, Oct 29, 1941

User avatar
ckkalyan
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1484
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:37 pm
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Contact:

Re: After Westgate, Interpol Chief Ponders 'Armed Citizenry'

Post by ckkalyan » Sun Nov 03, 2013 9:41 am

:clap:

Bravo - Ronald Noble, bravo! :cheering:
When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns!

sa_ali
Shooting true
Shooting true
Posts: 945
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:50 pm

Re: After Westgate, Interpol Chief Ponders 'Armed Citizenry'

Post by sa_ali » Mon Dec 09, 2013 4:18 pm

very well said, how to protect the soft target.

You cannot have police every where and if they are there you cant have them in in enough no to protect innocents, In mumbai central 26/11 we had police men, but they were held obsolete weapons and out numbered as the targets kept moving.

They need to think hard.

Post Reply