Indians For Guns

As you may know that this month UN is going to approve this treaty which will severely curtail private gun owership and have databases.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-new ... 60872.aspx

With absolutely no data available on the number of firearms holders in the state, the home department has decided to create a database of all licences issued and names of firearm holders in a digital format.
In the current scenario, if there is a shooting incident in a specific area,
there is no way that the police can use the licence issuing data to identify the person using the weapon.

Also, the growing number of cases of people possessing licences and never renewing them has given rise to arms trafficking. "This will not only help the police tackle crime, but will also help regulate processes of licence renewal, buying the weapon within the three-month deadline, and keeping tap on people who have illegal weapons. It will plug the loopholes in the system," said minister of state for home Satej Patil while revealing the new initiative by the department.

SO now the govt can easily take your guns away.IS NAGRI going to do anything about it.Wont this violate article 21 and privacy?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arms_Trade_Treaty

Also the US fast and furious scandal was done in collusion with the whitehouse and mexican cartels.They were sending guns over the border to have an excuse to ban semi auto guns but it came out and the us attorney general was found to be in contempt of court.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/indi ... 084646.cms

now india was arms trade treaty.Say goodbye to guns.

I do believe that V.P.Singh,a BJP MP had sent a letter signed by more than 100 MP's cutting across party lines expressing concerns about certain aspects of the proposed treaty.India is as yet,not a signatory to this.

The irony.Kalashnikovs available for purchase in the country, and they want to hound people with .32 s......

http://cache.epapr.in/48549/c24ecdda-ae ... 22/2x2.png

Read para no. 3 and the last para in particular.

http://iapcar.org/?p=970

It bans guns totally.
rohibited Transfers

A State Party shall not authorize any transfer of conventional arms within the scope of this Treaty if the transfer would violate any obligation under any measure adopted by the United Nations Security Council acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations, in particular arms embargoes.

A State Party shall not authorize any transfer of conventional arms within the scope of this Treaty if the transfer would violate its relevant international obligations, under international agreements, to which it is a Party, in particular those relating to the international transfer of, or illicit trafficking in, conventional arms.

A State Party shall not authorize a transfer of conventional arms within the scope of this Treaty for the purpose of facilitating the commission of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes constituting grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 1949, or serious violations of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Convention of 1949.

Each State Party shall take the appropriate measures, within national laws and regulations, to regulate transfers of conventional arms within the scope of the Treaty.
http://www.infowars.com/bombshell-un-gu ... -ban-guns/

The treaty could not be signed....this time

The secretary general said he was disappointed at the failure to agree on a treaty, calling it "a setback." But he said he was encouraged that states have agreed to continue pursuing a treaty and pledged his "robust" support.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2012 ... ilure.html

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07 ... more-time/

They promise to keep working on it, you better stay focused and prepared - Haji