IHP rear sight mini project
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:47 pm
I have IHP rear sight on the SPAR and the IHP35. Both were horrible to shoot with.
The original sight on the IHP 35 was crooked and misaligned and the windage screw needs a screw driver to turn it.
On both sights the elevation screw and thus elevation alignment were flaky, shaky and unreliable.
Neither sights had the firm and positive clicks I get on my Diana 35 and the spare M54 rear sight that Jeetesh gifted to me.
I came across a couple of IHP 35s from yester years in the past week and got a good sense of how the rear sights actually worked. I figured by substituting and cannibalising I could get to have one sight which was to my liking.
So some spares from the SPAR's sight, with some filing of the the top and bottom housings and some parts from the IHP 35 rear sight were put together and I managed to have one sight which was parrallel, true, not crooked etc. to my liking.
The positive clicks on elevation were still elusive and I determined correctly that the elevation screw needed to stop earlier than designed, when rotated to move the sight downwards. I jammed in a plastic spacer about a millimeter thick in the bottom housing of the sight underneath the elevation screw (marked with yellow arrow). This did it, now positive clicks were indeed positive.
The IHP 35 front sight was tilted to one side because one side was slightly longer by about an mm again than the other. I filed away the extra metal and cut in a new groove with a triangular file, this again got me to my true, parallel, not crooked paradise.
Before final assembly I applied machine oil to the innards as there wont be a need to open the sight again for quite some time.
I will zero the IHP 35 with the "new" sight later.
It was a good learning experience, but reflects very poorly on IHP manufacturing and quality control (if there is any).
I dont think I will buy another new springer from IHP. The older ones are worth putting money on. My worry is they will make a mess of the new PCP models Prodn. and QC, they did mess up with the side lever match pneumatic manufacturing and QC, inspite of having a good design from the doc.
Really curious to see how the Chinese stuff is, Keeping my fingers crossed and I hope I land one from Jonah.
Should also be able to make an interesting Hindi/Chini comparison.
Manish
The original sight on the IHP 35 was crooked and misaligned and the windage screw needs a screw driver to turn it.
On both sights the elevation screw and thus elevation alignment were flaky, shaky and unreliable.
Neither sights had the firm and positive clicks I get on my Diana 35 and the spare M54 rear sight that Jeetesh gifted to me.
I came across a couple of IHP 35s from yester years in the past week and got a good sense of how the rear sights actually worked. I figured by substituting and cannibalising I could get to have one sight which was to my liking.
So some spares from the SPAR's sight, with some filing of the the top and bottom housings and some parts from the IHP 35 rear sight were put together and I managed to have one sight which was parrallel, true, not crooked etc. to my liking.
The positive clicks on elevation were still elusive and I determined correctly that the elevation screw needed to stop earlier than designed, when rotated to move the sight downwards. I jammed in a plastic spacer about a millimeter thick in the bottom housing of the sight underneath the elevation screw (marked with yellow arrow). This did it, now positive clicks were indeed positive.
The IHP 35 front sight was tilted to one side because one side was slightly longer by about an mm again than the other. I filed away the extra metal and cut in a new groove with a triangular file, this again got me to my true, parallel, not crooked paradise.
Before final assembly I applied machine oil to the innards as there wont be a need to open the sight again for quite some time.
I will zero the IHP 35 with the "new" sight later.
It was a good learning experience, but reflects very poorly on IHP manufacturing and quality control (if there is any).
I dont think I will buy another new springer from IHP. The older ones are worth putting money on. My worry is they will make a mess of the new PCP models Prodn. and QC, they did mess up with the side lever match pneumatic manufacturing and QC, inspite of having a good design from the doc.
Really curious to see how the Chinese stuff is, Keeping my fingers crossed and I hope I land one from Jonah.
Should also be able to make an interesting Hindi/Chini comparison.
Manish