Dr. Jayakumar:
Suggest you have a look at this, which (for me) is quite convincing:
http://www.firearmstactical.com/pdf/fbi-hwfe.pdf
Quoting from the conclusion of this document:
Kinetic energy does not wound. Temporary cavity does not wound. The much discussed "shock" of bullet impact is a fable and "knock down" power is a myth. The critical element is penetration. The bullet must pass through the large, blood bearing organs and be of sufficient diameter to promote rapid bleeding. Penetration less than 12 inches is too little, and, in the words of two of the participants in the 1987 Wound Ballistics Workshop, "too little penetration will get you killed." Given desirable and reliable penetration, the only way to increase bullet effectiveness is to increase the severity of the wound by increasing the size of hole made by the bullet. Any bullet which will not penetrate through vital organs from less than optimal angles is not acceptable. Of those that will penetrate, the edge is always with the bigger bullet.
There have been a number of performance tests run on .32 ACP ammunition. The result of these tests appears unanimous to me, and that is that only FMJ bullets can come close to achieving the 12" minimum penetration requirement, and that the fancy expanding bullets fall far short of this. Using FMJ, by the way, eliminates this problem mentioned in the article you provided a link for:
But if you throw in a shorter over all cartridge (ie hollow points) then they are able to move more forward and back in the mag which could allow the bottom of the top rim to get behind the top of the bottom rim like this (The top round would be rim locked if this were to occur in the mag):
So the happy conclusion I've come to for my own personal .32 ACP carry is to use the commonly available (an much cheaper) FMJ, rather than the fancy Cor-Bon expanding hollow points. I do have other carry options, but when I travel, carrying my DA CZ 50 semiauto gives me a very compact package that conceals easily and also will slip into a pocket of my camera case. The .32 ACP has been around forever and is, perhaps, the most chambered round for handguns ever (aside, perhaps, from the .22 rimfire variants). While it certainly isn't optimal from an effectiveness standpoint, it is much more concealable than many alternatives.
Anyway, I find that this solves the "rimlock" problem you mention. I will say, however, that with all of the ammunition I've tried in my CZ 50, I have NEVER encountered this problem. Naturally, as one would expect for a carry gun, I have tested ALL of the different types of ammunition I use for carry purposes at the range, and have satisfied myself that it is going to work.
Do you know, the British, leading up to World War 1, built many dreadnought battleships. However, as a cost cutting measure, they only made a superficial, cursory test of the shells used for these guns. Had British shells been effective, they would have sunk many more corresponding German ships in the Battle of Jutland. Reading this record, one cannot fail to be impressed by the way the British sacrificed so much as a nation to build and man a fleet of battleships to protect their nation, but scrimped on the projectile those battleships were meant to deliver!
Do not make this same mistake! You MUST know that the ammunition you use in a carry gun is going to WORK when the chips are down, and the only way to do this is to shoot the ammunition in the gun you are going to carry. What is the point of going through so much trouble and expense of obtaining and carrying a gun, and then scrimping on the very point of carrying the gun in the first place: as a tool to deliver a bullet if necessary?
This is the same conclusion that the author of your linked article has come to:
My personal opinion is to carry FMJ in my p-32. This is because of the better penetration of the FMJ and it being more likely to get to something vital. That and looking at how many of the HP's that did not expand, or only expanded a little (look here) was not worth the trade off in penetration and reliability of FMJ's to me. That you must decide for yourself.
If you follow his link where he says "(look here)", you will go to the Golden Loki site where a lot of the .32 ACP ammunition tests I've mentioned have been conducted.
For me, this over 100 year old cartridge's issues were solved many years ago, and over and over since then. Now, it seems, we are relearning the same lesson one more time: The genius of John M Browning (the developer of the .32 ACP cartridge) still stands as a practical, reliable, and useful contribution to our choice of available firearms.