Safarigent wrote:Anyone used this company?
http://www.conetrol.com/
They seem to have some good quality bases and QD system.
I basiy want something wherein i can use the iron sights with ease after removing the scope.
Their QD system is so new that I have not seen it yet, and they don't show you any picture on their website. Leupold makes good ones, I especially like their "QR" type for good return to zero. Their "QRW" for Weaver-type bases is good, too. As are Warne mounts. In my experience, Weaver style mounts tend to return within 2-3 minutes of angle when removed and replaced. Though they may settle back to zero after the first few shots. That being said, it probably does not apply to all Weaver-style/Picatinny mounts, which everyone is making nowadays.
Whatever reticle you pick for the scope, do not err on the fine side. Our "duplex" reticles tend to have the center crosshairs too fine for a DG scope, for that the German #4 is better, in my opinion.
I don't think you can go wrong with a Leopold, they are my top choice among American scopes. Never had any problems with any. Nikon scopes I have no personal experience with, but share Grumpy's view. With some of the other brands you can be very happy with, or be quickly disappointed. Especially if you don't go with the top of their line scope.
Wonder what kind of rear sight you have on that rifle, as the .375 came with two leaves on the same "flip" sight. Or is your rifle not a pre-64 ?