Page 1 of 1
INSAS Bayonet Review
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:17 pm
by jonahpach
Just came across a review of the INSAS Bayonet in the net and just like its namesake the INSAS, Not too flattering I am afraid!
Here's the link..
http://www.ak47bayonets.com/gear/Gear_R ... 1148233138
Jonah
Re: INSAS Bayonet Review
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:29 pm
by hvj1
Like I said before, no pride, no worthy product!
Re: INSAS Bayonet Review
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:10 am
by Subal das
Chines army seems like having better choice
Re: INSAS Bayonet Review
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:15 pm
by chrisjackripper
This is a genuine bayonet, used of course. The bayonet shows some sign of wear. I’m sure the difference can be spotted.
Re: INSAS Bayonet Review
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:46 pm
by Rajat
I guess the guys on the Front deserve better equipment.
Re: INSAS Bayonet Review
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:00 pm
by cottage cheese
Hardly surprising....with hundreds of thousands of No1 Mk3 Lee Enfields in stock, the imbeciles might just as well have adapted the INSAS for the old Enfield bayonets....that would at least have left the INSAS system with one decent component.
regards,
cc
Re: INSAS Bayonet Review
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:09 pm
by eljefe
cottage cheese wrote:Hardly surprising....with hundreds of thousands of No1 Mk3 Lee Enfields in stock, the imbeciles might just as well have adapted the INSAS for the old Enfield bayonets....that would at least have left the INSAS system with one decent component.
regards,
cc
+10
