Rifle Catridge Comparison
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 3:57 pm
- Location: New Delhi
Rifle Catridge Comparison
Source: http://www.everydaynodaysoff.com/2010/0 ... omparison/
Click on the source to see a bigger picture.
Regards
Jeff Cooper advocated four basic rules of gun safety:
1) All guns are always loaded. Even if they are not, treat them as if they are.
2) Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy.
3) Keep your finger off the trigger till your sights are on the target.
4) Identify your target, and what is behind it.
1) All guns are always loaded. Even if they are not, treat them as if they are.
2) Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy.
3) Keep your finger off the trigger till your sights are on the target.
4) Identify your target, and what is behind it.
-
- Learning the ropes
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:03 am
- Location: TN
Re: Rifle Catridge Comparison
Hi m24,
you browsed out
Tremendously outstanding and excellent comparision picture.
Muthu
you browsed out
Tremendously outstanding and excellent comparision picture.
Muthu
-
- Almost at nirvana
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 5:25 pm
- Location: GOA
Re: Rifle Catridge Comparison
SURFACE TO AIR MISSILE
Whoever said the pen is mightier than the sword never encountered automatic weapons !
Whoever said the pen is mightier than the sword never encountered automatic weapons !
- Mark
- Veteran
- Posts: 1147
- Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 10:37 am
- Location: Middle USA
Re: Rifle Catridge Comparison
I don't like tables because the data can be portrayed so out of context that it is pretty irrelevant.
Here is the 3rd paragraph from that page:
It is worth remembering that the majority of authorities agree that recoil of over twenty foot pounds will cause most shooters to develop a serous flinch, which is ruinous to bullet placement (the prime component of killing power). Fifteen foot pounds is probably about the maximum recoil energy most shooters feel reasonably comfortable with, particularly at the shooting range, where most serious marksmanship practice occurs.
Yet, here is another table written by the same gent, but for shotguns:
http://www.chuckhawks.com/shotgun_recoil_table.htm
I've taken the liberty of pasting it here:
Gauge, length (oz. shot@MV) Gun weight (lbs.) Recoil energy (ft. lbs.)
.410 bore, 2.5" (1/2 at 1200) 5.5 7.1
.410 bore, 3" (11/16 at 1135) 5.5 10.5
28 gauge, 2.75" (3/4 at 1200) 6.0 12.8
20 gauge, 2.75" (7/8 at 1200) 6.5 16.1
20 gauge, 2.75" (1 at 1220) 6.5 21.0
20 gauge, 2.75" (1 1/8 at 1175) 6.5 25.0
20 gauge, 3" (1 1/4 at 1185) 6.5 31.0
16 gauge, 2.75" (1 at 1220) 7.0 21.5
16 gauge, 2.75" (1 1/8 at 1240) 7.0 27.6
12 gauge, 2.75" (1 at 1180) 7.5 17.3
12 gauge, 2.75" (1 1/8 at 1200) 7.5 23.0
12 gauge, 2.75" (1 1/4 at 1330) 7.5 32.0
12 gauge, 2.75" (1 1/2 at 1260) 7.5 45.0
12 gauge, 3" (1 5/8 at 1280) 7.5 52.0
12 gauge, 3" (1 7/8 at 1210) 8.75 54.0
10 gauge, 3.5" (2 1/4 at 1210) 10.5 62.9
As you can see, the 12 gauge starts at 17 ft lbs. My point is that if you can shoot a 12 gauge you should not be afraid to properly shoot any gun, and try to take many of these tables with an awareness of that.
(I'll not go into how fit of the stock and weight of the gun makes a huge difference, as does the shooters hold or position)
-- Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:08 am --
Well shoot, spent a few minutes trying to get the table to look nice and formatted but it doesn't get accepted that way, apologies to all.
Here is the 3rd paragraph from that page:
It is worth remembering that the majority of authorities agree that recoil of over twenty foot pounds will cause most shooters to develop a serous flinch, which is ruinous to bullet placement (the prime component of killing power). Fifteen foot pounds is probably about the maximum recoil energy most shooters feel reasonably comfortable with, particularly at the shooting range, where most serious marksmanship practice occurs.
Yet, here is another table written by the same gent, but for shotguns:
http://www.chuckhawks.com/shotgun_recoil_table.htm
I've taken the liberty of pasting it here:
Gauge, length (oz. shot@MV) Gun weight (lbs.) Recoil energy (ft. lbs.)
.410 bore, 2.5" (1/2 at 1200) 5.5 7.1
.410 bore, 3" (11/16 at 1135) 5.5 10.5
28 gauge, 2.75" (3/4 at 1200) 6.0 12.8
20 gauge, 2.75" (7/8 at 1200) 6.5 16.1
20 gauge, 2.75" (1 at 1220) 6.5 21.0
20 gauge, 2.75" (1 1/8 at 1175) 6.5 25.0
20 gauge, 3" (1 1/4 at 1185) 6.5 31.0
16 gauge, 2.75" (1 at 1220) 7.0 21.5
16 gauge, 2.75" (1 1/8 at 1240) 7.0 27.6
12 gauge, 2.75" (1 at 1180) 7.5 17.3
12 gauge, 2.75" (1 1/8 at 1200) 7.5 23.0
12 gauge, 2.75" (1 1/4 at 1330) 7.5 32.0
12 gauge, 2.75" (1 1/2 at 1260) 7.5 45.0
12 gauge, 3" (1 5/8 at 1280) 7.5 52.0
12 gauge, 3" (1 7/8 at 1210) 8.75 54.0
10 gauge, 3.5" (2 1/4 at 1210) 10.5 62.9
As you can see, the 12 gauge starts at 17 ft lbs. My point is that if you can shoot a 12 gauge you should not be afraid to properly shoot any gun, and try to take many of these tables with an awareness of that.
(I'll not go into how fit of the stock and weight of the gun makes a huge difference, as does the shooters hold or position)
-- Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:08 am --
Well shoot, spent a few minutes trying to get the table to look nice and formatted but it doesn't get accepted that way, apologies to all.
"What if he had no knife? In that case he would not be a good bushman so there is no need to consider the possibility." H.A. Lindsay, 1947