Page 1 of 1

Which one is better in Service and Performance?

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 6:54 pm
by hellboyraden
Which one is better in service and performance?

IOF.32 REVOLVER

OR


IOF .22 REVOLVER..?

Re: Which one is better in Service and Performance?

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:18 pm
by MoA
The SW 686 :P

Better for what?

Re: Which one is better in Service and Performance?

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:52 pm
by Amit357
They both are crap,but you can covert them to fire at least 50 % of the times you squeeze the trigger,22 has one major problem thats the only ammo you can use is Eley Tennex,32 has all the problems form a misaligned chamber to the timing.I think IOF really likes Gun Smiths or deal with them on % basis,cause till date i have seen only one handgun from IOF which after 4 + years is still firing all the Chanbers. :roll:

Re: Which one is better in Service and Performance?

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 10:02 pm
by hvj1
If you are looking for life long trouble free service and performance then you may use either of the above or both as a paper weight. :mrgreen:

Re: Which one is better in Service and Performance?

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 10:16 pm
by winnie_the_pooh
Amit357 wrote:They both are crap,but you can covert them to fire at least 50 % of the times you squeeze the trigger,22 has one major problem thats the only ammo you can use is Eley Tennex,32 has all the problems form a misaligned chamber to the timing.I think IOF really likes Gun Smiths or deal with them on % basis,cause till date i have seen only one handgun from IOF which after 4 + years is still firing all the Chanbers. :roll:
My experience has been different from yours as far as the .32 revolver goes.I have owned one and fired a couple of more.A friends was pretty accurate.The newer ones are by and large ok.Have no experience with the .22 revolver.