Why the IOF 0.22 bore revolver is called a crap

Posts related to handguns (pistols, revolvers)
Post Reply
T T
Learning the ropes
Learning the ropes
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:50 pm

Why the IOF 0.22 bore revolver is called a crap

Post by T T » Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:48 pm

:roll: Is the revolver not accurate or gets jammed or fails to fire when trigger is pressed?
As seen in photo, it is a beautiful gun. What is attractive about it is its lightness and small size.
The new IOF 0.32 bore long barrel revolver is also very beautiful and has long range of 25 meters. But it is heavy (above 800 gm) and long. When you have to always keep a handgun in your pant pocket, you should consider buying a small lighter one (share your experience).

For Advertising mail webmaster
goodboy_mentor
Old Timer
Old Timer
Posts: 2928
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 12:35 pm

Re: Why the IOF 0.22 bore revolver is called a crap

Post by goodboy_mentor » Sat Mar 31, 2012 3:49 pm

If you had made some efforts to search this thread, you would have got the answer. Please read this http://indiansforguns.com/viewtopic.php ... 00#p160696 Also .22 caliber has very little stopping power.

Please note that the guns(other than those made for display etc. only) are not appreciated by their beauty but by their reliability and intended result producing capability. What will you do with a beautiful gun if it is not reliable or cannot produce intended results? AK 47 is not known for its beauty but is known because of its exceptional reliability and result producing capability.

Keeping a handgun in pant pocket is not a safe practice. Please do not go by what the actors in movies do and use a holster to keep your handgun.
"If my mother tongue is shaking the foundations of your State, it probably means that you built your State on my land" - Musa Anter, Kurdish writer, assassinated by the Turkish secret services in 1992

Post Reply