The Pune bomb blast and the govt.'s stand on terror strikes
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 12:04 pm
The Hon'ble Home Minister has clarified certain things
1.It was not an intelligence failure as the attack took place on a "soft target".Anything can happen on a soft target.
You and I are soft targets.If tomorrow a couple of us or even a couple of hundred of us are slaughtered,it would not be an intelligence failure.
Another conclusion that you can draw is that intelligence that points to an attack on a "hard target" alone is of importance and actionable.Perhaps the intelligences agencies are geared towards thwarting attack only on hard targets(VIP's , infrastructure and national institutions).
This should reassure us all.Only soft targets were attacked and killed.No need for panic.
2.The police can't give 24/7 protection.
We already know this.They are there to give 24/7 protection to only the VIP's and their ilk.It is what makes them "hard targets".We should all pay taxes to provide better protection to these hard targets.God forbid something happens to them.
3.It was not an overt attack by a gun man but through an "insidious" bomb in a back pack.
Another way of saying,"We can do nothing to stop something like this happening".
"Insidious bomb" is an addition to the "cowardly attack" often used in describing such incidents by politicians.Does it not remind you of the filmy dialogue often used by the hero ,"Maa ka doodh piya hai to bahar ake ladd" .Does it not make our politicians look very heroic.
4."He...assured that a spokesperson would regularly update the press"
Here is an update carried in the The Indian Express that also carried the quotable quotes given above,"Traces of nitro group compounds and pieces of metal and shrapnel indicating the device had a clock timer,were noticed by Home Minister P Chidambram when he visited Pune this morning,they said"
He is a forensics expert as well.Whoopi.
5."Indian cities are no less vulnerable than any other in the world when it came to terror attacks".
The same as those in 'failed states' I am sure.Rwanda,Congo,Haiti.....So reassuring.
The govt had taken adds in national dailies some time back croaking about how there had been no terror attacks in the last one year.They conveniently glossed over violence by Naxalite and sundry groups in the North East.
Since the govt. took responsibility for some thing that was a combination of various circumstances that it had no role in creating,would it now take responsibility for it's failure in preventing this?
1.It was not an intelligence failure as the attack took place on a "soft target".Anything can happen on a soft target.
You and I are soft targets.If tomorrow a couple of us or even a couple of hundred of us are slaughtered,it would not be an intelligence failure.
Another conclusion that you can draw is that intelligence that points to an attack on a "hard target" alone is of importance and actionable.Perhaps the intelligences agencies are geared towards thwarting attack only on hard targets(VIP's , infrastructure and national institutions).
This should reassure us all.Only soft targets were attacked and killed.No need for panic.
2.The police can't give 24/7 protection.
We already know this.They are there to give 24/7 protection to only the VIP's and their ilk.It is what makes them "hard targets".We should all pay taxes to provide better protection to these hard targets.God forbid something happens to them.
3.It was not an overt attack by a gun man but through an "insidious" bomb in a back pack.
Another way of saying,"We can do nothing to stop something like this happening".
"Insidious bomb" is an addition to the "cowardly attack" often used in describing such incidents by politicians.Does it not remind you of the filmy dialogue often used by the hero ,"Maa ka doodh piya hai to bahar ake ladd" .Does it not make our politicians look very heroic.
4."He...assured that a spokesperson would regularly update the press"
Here is an update carried in the The Indian Express that also carried the quotable quotes given above,"Traces of nitro group compounds and pieces of metal and shrapnel indicating the device had a clock timer,were noticed by Home Minister P Chidambram when he visited Pune this morning,they said"
He is a forensics expert as well.Whoopi.
5."Indian cities are no less vulnerable than any other in the world when it came to terror attacks".
The same as those in 'failed states' I am sure.Rwanda,Congo,Haiti.....So reassuring.
The govt had taken adds in national dailies some time back croaking about how there had been no terror attacks in the last one year.They conveniently glossed over violence by Naxalite and sundry groups in the North East.
Since the govt. took responsibility for some thing that was a combination of various circumstances that it had no role in creating,would it now take responsibility for it's failure in preventing this?