Page 1 of 1

For what it is worth..

Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 11:48 pm
by MoA
Blog Has absolutely nothing to do with guns.

Re: For what it is worth..

Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 11:58 pm
by Subal das
Why your computer is slow and the Network congested

We just have to design our systems with 63 bit architecture rather than 64 bit architecture. That way we will underuse the available capacity, and will have outsmarted the ravages of electricity.
wow!! thanks for sharing. def that is one of the most stupidest thing I ever read about computers

Re: For what it is worth..

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:00 am
by MoA
Subal das wrote:
Why your computer is slow and the Network congested

We just have to design our systems with 63 bit architecture rather than 64 bit architecture. That way we will underuse the available capacity, and will have outsmarted the ravages of electricity.
wow!! thanks for sharing. def that is one of the most stupidest thing I ever read about computers
You do know what humor is? :roll:

Re: For what it is worth..

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:27 am
by hamiclar01
MoA wrote: You do know what humor is? :roll:
:mrgreen: .

BTW, congrats. Look forwards to reading more

Re: For what it is worth..

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:59 am
by timmy
The computer piece is an interesting theory, but I fear that the blogger is all wrong. We old telecom guys, who have been familiar with digital transmission long before these ethernet whiz kids were a gleam in someone's eye know that the problem has nothing to do with data boulders at all, or the hypothesis of congestion caused by collisions with such boulders.

The neophyte blogger must actually start at the root of the problem, which is fundamentally philosophical, by realizing that all of us are simply flotsam and jetsam, cast aside on the banks of the bit stream of life.

Once he realizes this, understanding and correcting the problem becomes simple!

First, notice how the author confuses electricity and electrons with bits. Using these terms interchangeably is an obvious clue to the incorrect nature of his explanation (besides not facing philosophical reality about life itself).

The problem lies with some of his bits, which he seems to acknowledge toward the end of his essay. But it is not that these bits are clogging up his system: The problem is that these bits are missing.

I don't wish to sound condescending, but frankly, I can see that this fellow is a total newbie in the field of digital electronics, because he has yet to mention one of the most critical of all components of any system running on digital formats, and that is the bit bucket. Naturally, this results in requests for retransmission and the resultant loss in processing power and bandwidth. If the problem is severe, bits from the retransmission requests can also be regularly lost, compounding the problem even further.

The author would find, if he would simply place bit buckets under the sharp bends of his wiring and by his wireless antennas, that bits are escaping at an alarming rate. This can be seen by how quickly his bit buckets are filling.

By periodically returning the contents of his bit buckets into the system (an ordinary plastic funnel can facilitate returning the errant bits into a handy USB or ethernet port), he will find his systems and networks running much happier.

Re: For what it is worth..

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:23 am
by Subal das
MoA wrote:
Subal das wrote:
Why your computer is slow and the Network congested

We just have to design our systems with 63 bit architecture rather than 64 bit architecture. That way we will underuse the available capacity, and will have outsmarted the ravages of electricity.
wow!! thanks for sharing. def that is one of the most stupidest thing I ever read about computers
You do know what humor is? :roll:
just messing bro :mrgreen:

Re: For what it is worth..

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 10:10 am
by dr.jayakumar
ooohh,
so many things to learn .(you are....it)
thanks