naga my friend, on this forum there have been several discussions between the pro and anti's with active participation from both sides. This is what, if I may use the term "provokes", members to get into a debate or start the discussion. We all have witnessed or at times been a part of it at one time or the other.
Now, I would say that active participation on both sides is what gets ball rolling. Participants on both sides are people who have knowledge, strong logic and some good sense. Each side does its best to convince and or convert the other.
The term poaching as it is recognized stands for illegal taking or hunting of plants or animals for different motives including profit, pleasure, done not in the set or legal parameters, with illegal weapons, on restricted land or done with unlawful or restricted means etc.
This said first of all (I truly mean it) all members on this forum as I know them are respected law abiding citizens and nothing on this forum is either done or discussed which can be deemed unlawful or even shady. Thus said, we all know that there are some hunters here who hunt out of India, ethically and within the confines of the law of the country they live in or are visiting. Nothing illegal is done in any case.
All discussions / debates are therefore between these hunters , people with pro and anti hunting sentiments. There are no poachers or pro poachers here. Did you ever see a pro poaching post here?
None. Therefore the discussion or debate does not come into existence.
Next question: did you ever see a post condemning illegal hunting or poaching?
Several, every now and then and no one feels that poaching is justified.
Everyone, I assume, with pro or anti hunting sentiments here is definitely against the poachers and their ways and means. There is no exception to it. The reason why there has not been such a discussion / debate, as is your complaint, is because there is no room for any such debate or discussion as everyone feels the same about it and there is no reason to just talk about it again and again. It is illegal and is a heinous crime and we all agree with it. Do you feel that the antis should post more about poaching etc? If so create a separate topic about your feelings or advice on how the anti's can hurt the poachers (assuming there are none on this forum) and I am sure members will oblige.
I hope you will be kind and re-think your statement "the problem with the antis are this, that they have no law full hobby and no logical sense. so they want to hurt other human beings in guise of protracting wildlife" and "have anyone heard/read/seen antis talk about how cruel the poachers are? nay not once. hence my reasoning, since they can not hurt the poachers etc who are outside the law so they hurt those how are within the law"
If not its fine
. I am not forcing my views on you.
Do not mean to offend anyone or spark off another discussion. Thanks.
I understand that this is not really the right place for this post so please forgive me.